Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 12;111(2):360–374. doi: 10.1007/s10266-022-00741-5

Table 4.

Means and Standard deviation [SD] values for restorative materials exposed to acidic artificial saliva without thermal cycling study, as well as comparisons between means (each, n = 10)

CAD/CAM restorative material Thickness [mm] Mean [N] ± SD Different (p < 0.05) from CAD/CAM restorative material number
(1) Cerasmart 0.5 1591 ± 82.1 (3)
(2) Straumann Nice 0.5 1517 ± 95.7 (3)
(3) Tetric CAD 0.5 1325 ± 163.6 (1)(2)