Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 16;14:46. doi: 10.1186/s13244-023-01387-9

Table 2.

Ultrasound characteristics of AR status in 104 patients

Characteristics AR + (n = 71) AR– (n = 33) χ2value p value
Shape 0.233 0.629
 Regular 5 (7.04%) 4 (12.12%)
 Irregular 66 (92.96%) 29 (87.88%)
Orientation 0.495 0.482
 Parallel 40 (56.34%) 21 (63.64%)
 Vertical 31 (43.66%) 12 (36.36%)
Hyperechoic halo 0.537 0.464
 Absent 42 (59.15%) 22 (66.67%)
 Present 29 (40.85%) 11 (33.33%)
Margin 14.493  < 0.001*
 Smooth 1 (1.41%) 9 (27.27%)
 Unsmooth 70 (98.59%) 24 (72.73%)
Posterior acoustic pattern 12.759 0.002*
 Enhancement 5 (7.04%) 10 (30.30%)
 No change 41 (57.75%) 19 (57.58%)
 Shadowing 25 (35.21%) 4 (12.12%)
Calcification 2.123 0.145
 Absent 18 (25.35%) 13 (39.39%)
 Present 53 (74.65%) 20 (60.61%)
Echo pattern 0.055 0.815
 Hypoechoic 6 (8.45%) 4 (12.12%)
 Heterogeneous 65 (91.55%) 29 (87.88%)
Adler grade 0.273 0.872
 0–1 9 (12.68%) 5 (15.15%)
 2 18 (25.35%) 7 (21.21%)
 3 44 (61.97%) 21 (63.64%)
Elasticity score 9.429 0.022*
 2 2 (2.82%) 2 (6.06%)
 3 20 (28.17%) 13 (39.39%)
 4 47 (66.20%) 13 (39.39%)
 5 2 (2.82%) 5 (15.15%)
BI-RADS 0.443 0.506
 3-4a 25 (35.21%) 8 (24.24%)
 4b-5 46 (64.79%) 25 (75.76%)

BI-RADS, Breast imaging-reporting and data system; AR, androgen receptor; * indicates p < 0.05