Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 3;14:1064642. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1064642

Table 1.

Basic characteristics of the analyzed cohort and patients excluded due to lack of double mRS assessment.

Patients with double mRS assessment (n = 105) Patients without mRS assessment at discharge from the stroke unit (n = 27) P value
Age (years), median (Q1–Q3) 73 (64–79) 70 (61–79) 0.456
Male sex, n (%) 52 (49.5) 21 (77.8) 0.008
Ischemic stroke, n (%) 94 (89.5) 24 (88.9) 1.00
Pre-stroke mRS 0–2, n (%)* 81 (81.0) 24 (96.0) 0.067
Reperfusion therapy, n (%)
Intravenous rtPA 34 (32.4) 10 (37.0) 0.647
Mechanical thrombectomy 13 (12.4) 3 (11.1) 1.00
NIHSS on admission to stroke unit, median (Q1–Q3) 8 (4.5–15) 8 (5–14) 1.00
NIHSS at discharge from stroke unit, median (Q1–Q3) 5 (3–10.5) 7 (4-10) 0.311
Duration of stroke unit stay (days), median (Q1–Q3) 15 (13–21) 14 (11–20) 0.209
Certified mRS rater in stroke unit, n (%) 91 (86.7) 19 (70.4) 0.043
Certified mRS rater in rehabilitation ward, n (%) 36 (34.3) 14 (51.9) 0.120

mRS, modified Rankin Scale; *n = 125, patients with reported pre-stroke mRS; Q1, first quartile; Q3, third quartile; rtPA, thrombolysis; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale.