TABLE 3.
Intervention [HR (95% CI)] | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAB + NIV | AXY + PEM | LEN + PEM | NIV + IPI | SUN | ||
Comparator | CAB + NIV | 1.05 (0.61; 1.54) | 0.95 (0.51; 1.46) | 1.11 (0.66; 1.61) | 1.62 (1.01; 2.29) | |
AXY + PEM | 1.01 (0.59; 1.49) | 0.92 (0.58; 1.29) | 1.07 (0.78; 1.37) | 1.57 (1.23; 1.91) | ||
LEN + PEM | 1.12 (0.60; 1.73) | 1.13 (0.71; 1.57) | 1.19 (0.79; 1.65) | 1.75 (1.21; 2.32) | ||
NIV + IPI | 0.95 (0.56; 1.37) | 0.95 (0.70; 1.22) | 0.87 (0.57; 1.19) | 1.48 (1.24; 1.73) | ||
SUN | 0.64 (0.40; 0.90) | 0.64 (0.51; 0.79) | 0.59 (0.41; 0.79) | 0.68 (0.57; 0.80) |
The values in each cell represent the relative treatment effect for the intervention on the top when compared to the intervention on the left. Green suggests a relative treatment benefit (light green a nonsignificant benefit, and dark green a significant benefit). Red suggests a relative treatment harm (light red a nonsignificant harm, and dark red a significant harm).AXY, axitinib; CAB, cabozantinib; IPI, ipilimumab; LEN, lenvatinib; NIV, nivolumab; PEM, pembrolizumab; SUN, sunitinib