TABLE 7.
Intervention [HR (95% CI)] | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAB + NIV | AXY + PEM | LEN + PEM | NIV + IPI | SUN | ||
Comparator | CAB + NIV | 1.48 (0.75; 2.31) | 0.80 (0.39; 1.26) | 1.61 (0.83; 2.50) | 2.19 (1.19; 3.35) | |
AXY + PEM | 0.73 (0.38; 1.14) | 0.54 (0.38; 0.73) | 1.10 (0.82; 1.39) | 1.50 (1.22; 1.79) | ||
LEN + PEM | 1.37 (0.67; 2.18) | 1.89 (1.32; 2.53) | 2.06 (1.43; 2.71) | 2.80 (2.09; 3.54) | ||
NIV + IPI | 0.67 (0.35; 1.04) | 0.93 (0.69; 1.17) | 0.50 (0.35; 0.66) | 1.38 (1.13; 1.62) | ||
SUN | 0.49 (0.26; 0.74) | 0.67 (0.55; 0.81) | 0.36 (0.27; 0.46) | 0.73 (0.60; 0.86) |
The values in each cell represent the relative treatment effect for the intervention on the top when compared to the intervention on the left. Green suggests a relative treatment benefit (light green a nonsignificant benefit, and dark green a significant benefit). Red suggests a relative treatment harm (light red a nonsignificant harm, and dark red a significant harm).AXY, axitinib; CAB, cabozantinib; IPI, ipilimumab; LEN, lenvatinib; NIV, nivolumab; PEM, pembrolizumab; SUN, sunitinib