Table 4.
Age (P for interaction 0.33) | Sex (P for interaction 0.16) | TyG index change slop(P for interaction 0.74) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
<45 years | ≥ 45 years | Female | Male | >0 | ≤0 | |
Quartiles | ||||||
Q1 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Q2 | 1.09 (0.92,1.30) | 1.02 (0.93,1.12) | 1.07 (0.88,1.30) | 1.03 (0.93,1.15) | 0.93 (0.81,1.05) | 1.16 (1.01,1.32) |
Q3 | 1.23 (1.06,1.50) | 1.07 (0.96,1.19) | 1.18 (0.98,1.43) | 1.11 (1.01,1.24) | 0.98 (0.94,1.01) | 1.28 (1.13,1.46) |
Q4 | 1.25 (1.06,1.46) | 1.11 (1.00,1.24) | 1.36 (1.12,1.65) | 1.14 (1.02,1.25) | 1.06 (1.01,1.11) | 1.50 (1.32,1.70) |
P for trend | <0.01 | 0.04 | 0.02 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
Adjusted for age (continuous variable, years), sex (categorical variable, men or women), LDL-C (as a continuous variable), HDL-C (as a continuous variable), hs-CRP (as a continuous variable), BMI (as a continuous variable), smoking status (as a categorical variable, yes or no), alcohol consumption status (as a categorical variable, yes or no), physical exercise habits (as a categorical variable, yes or no), educational level (as a categorical variable, high school or above vs. below high school level), hypertension (as a categorical variable, yes or no), the use of lipid-lowering drugs (as a categorical variable, yes or no) in 2010, and TyG index (continuous variable) in baseline.