Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Mar 17.
Published in final edited form as: Ophthalmology. 2015 May 9;122(7):1426–1437. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.04.006

Table 3.

Comparison of Visual and Anatomic Outcomes in Patients Treated with 0.5 mg versus 2.0 mg Ranibizumab

Outcome Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
0.5 mg RBZ
(n = 22)
2.0 mg RBZ
(n = 20)
P Value 0.5 mg RBZ
(n = 19)
2.0 mg RBZ
(n = 20)
P Value
BCVA at baseline (letter score) 54.3±3.2 48.9±3.6 0.27 47.1±3.7 46.7±3.0 0.78
BCVA at 24 wks (letter score) 66.4±3.4 63.4±2.7 0.49 62.6±4.2 62.5±3.5 0.97
Change from baseline BCVA 12.1±2.9 14.6±2.3 0.31 15.5±2.4 15.8±2.4 0.94
Percentage of patients gaining in letter score (no. of letters)
 ≥15 27.3 50.0 0.23 52.6 60.0 0.89
 ≥10 54.5 70.0 0.48 84.2 75.0 0.70
 ≥5 63.6 90.0 0.07 84.2 85.0 1.0
CST at baseline (μm) 539.2±36.5 624.0±46.1 0.16 608.6±40.1 672.8±46.5 0.33
CST at 24 wks (μm) 336.0±29.1 331.9±20.0 0.67 355.1±34.4 276.7±12.4 0.14
Change from baseline CST −203.3±41.0 −292.1±51.7 0.19 −253.5±43.0 −396.1±48.1 0.03
Percentage (no.) of patients with CST ≤320 μm at 24 wks 68.2 (15) 55.0 (11) 0.58 52.6 (10) 90.0 (18) 0.03

BCVA = best-corrected visual acuity; CST = central subfield thickness; RBZ = Ranibizumab.