Skip to main content
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases logoLink to Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
. 1987 Mar;46(3):203–208. doi: 10.1136/ard.46.3.203

Functional assessment of the hand: reproducibility, acceptability, and utility of a new system for measuring strength.

P Helliwell, A Howe, V Wright
PMCID: PMC1002100  PMID: 3579383

Abstract

A new system for measuring strength of the hand using a torsion dynamometer linked to a microprocessor is described. The system permits analysis of timed squeezes of both grip and pinch and is adjustable to all sizes of hand and degrees of hand deformity. Results obtained with the system were found to be reproducible, and the rigid device was acceptable to a group of patients with arthritic hands. In rheumatoid arthritis there is a marked reduction in maximum grip and pinch strength, together with a prolongation of the time taken to reach this maximum, and increased fatigue. The limitations of grip strength as a measure of function of the hand are discussed.

Full text

PDF
208

Images in this article

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Clawson D. K., Souter W. A., Carthum C. J., Hymen M. L. Functional assessment of the rheumatoid hand. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1971;77:203–210. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Duym B. W., Pfurtscheller G. Measurement of the quality of hand contractions. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1984 May;22(3):245–250. doi: 10.1007/BF02442750. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Grindulis K. A., Calverley M. Grip strength: peak or sustained pressure in rheumatoid arthritis? J Chronic Dis. 1983;36(12):855–858. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(83)90006-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Jones A. R., Unsworth A., Haslock I. A microcomputer controlled hand assessment system used for clinical measurement. Eng Med. 1985 Oct;14(4):191–198. doi: 10.1243/emed_jour_1985_014_044_02. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lee P., Baxter A., Dick W. C., Webb J. An assessment of grip strength measurement in rheumatoid arthritis. Scand J Rheumatol. 1974;3(1):17–23. doi: 10.3109/03009747409165124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lenman J. A., Potter J. L. Electromyographic measurement of fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis and neuromuscular disease. Ann Rheum Dis. 1966 Jan;25(1):76–84. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Myers D. B., Grennan D. M., Palmer D. G. Hand grip function in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1980 Aug;61(8):369–373. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Myers D. B., Wilson K., Palmer D. G. An objective measurement of change in morning stiffness. Rheumatol Int. 1981;1(3):135–137. doi: 10.1007/BF00541258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Rhind V. M., Bird H. A., Wright V. A comparison of clinical assessments of disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1980 Apr;39(2):135–137. doi: 10.1136/ard.39.2.135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ritchie D. M., Boyle J. A., McInnes J. M., Jasani M. K., Dalakos T. G., Grieveson P., Buchanan W. W. Clinical studies with an articular index for the assessment of joint tenderness in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Q J Med. 1968 Jul;37(147):393–406. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Steinberg V. L., Parry C. B. Electromyographic Changes in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Br Med J. 1961 Mar 4;1(5226):630–632. doi: 10.1136/bmj.1.5226.630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. WRIGHT V., JOHNS R. J. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of joint stiffness in normal subjects and in patients with connective tissue diseases. Ann Rheum Dis. 1961 Mar;20:36–46. doi: 10.1136/ard.20.1.36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Walker P. S., Davidson W., Erkman M. J. An apparatus to assess function of the hand. J Hand Surg Am. 1978 Mar;3(2):189–193. doi: 10.1016/s0363-5023(78)80072-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES