Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Mar 17.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Intern Med. 2020 May 12;172(11):717–725. doi: 10.7326/M19-3583

Table 2.

Outcomes: Stroke and/or TIA Recurrence in the Shunt Versus the No-Shunt Group

Outcome* No-Shunt Group (n = 835) Shunt Group (n = 243) Unadjusted Adjusted
Events, n Event Rate per 100 Patient-Years Events, n Event Rate per 100 Patient-Years HR (95% CI) P Value HR (95% CI) P Value
Recurrent ischemic stroke/TIA 24 0.75 18 2.32 3.05 (1.65–5.62) <0.001 3.01 (1.59–5.69) <0.001
 Ischemic stroke 13 0.40 10 1.29 3.16 (1.38–7.21) 0.006 3.33 (1.41–7.84) 0.006
  Cryptogenic 3 0.09 7 0.90 9.62 (2.48–37.27) 0.001 10.17 (2.54–40.64) 0.001
  Noncryptogenic§ 10 0.31 3 0.39 1.23 (0.34–4.47) 0.75 1.26 (0.33–4.83) 0.73
 TIA 11 0.34 8 1.03 2.92 (1.17–7.25) 0.021 2.66 (1.02–6.91) 0.045

HR = hazard ratio; TIA = transient ischemic attack.

*

Outcome is the first event to occur in patients after patent foramen ovale closure.

All values were adjusted for age; study period; device; presence or absence of atrial septal aneurysm, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, hypercoagulable state, and hypermobile septum; and medication use (aspirin, clopidogrel, warfarin) by using the propensity score method.

Recurrent ischemic strokes were adjudicated as cryptogenic or noncryptogenic according to TOAST (Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment) criteria.

§

Includes 7 patients with cardioembolism, 1 patient with large artery atherosclerosis, 4 patients with small vessel occlusion, and 1 patient with trauma.