Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 13;1(10):e0000024. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000024

Table 2. Parameters for DALYs and Wolbachia programme cost-effectiveness computation.

Parameter Value Source
Disability weight for symptomatic cases of DF from WHO, (literature), D 0.211 (0.81) [42, 43]
Disability weight for symptomatic cases of DHF from WHO, (literature), D 0.5 (0.85) [43, 44]
Mean disability weight for symptomatic ambulatory, (hospitalized) children cases, D 0.37 (0.52) [45]
Mean disability weight for symptomatic ambulatory, (hospitalized) adult cases, D 0.42 (0.53) [45]
Social discount rate for DALYs calculations, r 0.03 [35, 46]
Age-weighting correction constant, C 0.16243 [46]
Parameter of the age-weighting function, β 0.04 [46]
Duration of disability in reported cases 10.4 [27, 47], ARDENT project
Duration of disability in unreported cases 4 [41]
Duration of disability in DHF cases 14 [22, 48]
Discount rate for premature deaths productivity lost 0.03 [35]
Median life expectancy of a Singaporean 85 [49]
Wolbachia steady-state cost per year1 (Mn, SGD) 40 NEA
Wolbachia steady-state cost per year2 (Mn, 2010USD) 22.7 Derived from the NEA estimate
% estimated reduction in dengue from Wolbachia programme3 40%– 80% [50]

1Yearly annual average cost of a national Wolbachia programme. This figure comprises renovation and equipment cost for mosquito production facilities; operating costs such as facility rental and maintenance, utilities, and consumables for mosquito production; manpower costs for production and release, and cost of community engagement initiatives.

2We derived the 2010USD cost using the mean exchange rate from 2010 to 2020 and the 2010 price level from the estimate in 1.

3Estimated in sites undergoing Wolbachia suppression programme trials which already have baseline levels of existing vector control measures.