Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 12;2(1):e0000078. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000078

Table 2. Overview of UK natural herd immunity discourse media debate by stakeholder type.

Stakeholder Type Natural herd immunity is an appropriate or efficacious COVID-19 control strategy/natural herd immunity working or being achieved Consequences of lockdown/related control m5easures exceed consequences of herd immunity approach At risk populations can be protected in herd immunity approach Healthcare services and capacity can be managed in herd immunity approach
Disagree Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Agree Disagree Agree
Academic 197 (66.6%) 99 (33.4%) 51 (46.8%) 58 (53.2%) 50 (40.7%) 73 (59.3%) 16 (72.7%) 6 (27.3%)
Government 36 (22.5%) 124 (77.5%) 6 (50.0%) 6 (50.0%) 7 (15.6%) 38 (84.4%) 5 (31.3%) 11 (68.8%)
Political 117 (96.7%) 4 (3.3%) 21 (91.3%) 2 (8.7%) 17 (89.5%) 2 (10.5%) 9 (100.0%) 0 (0.0%)
Public Health/Medical 106 (96.3%) 4 (3.7%) 28 (90.3%) 3 (9.7%) 11 (91.7%) 1 (8.3%) 4 (100.0%) 0 (0.0%)
Journalism/Media 32 (71.1%) 13 (28.9%) 13 (59.1%) 9 (40.9%) 6 (54.5%) 5 (45.5%) 3 (75.0%) 1 (25.0%)
Individual 8 (47.1%) 9 (52.9%) 3 (100.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 2 (100.0%) 2 (100.0%) 0 (0.0%)
Business 4 (33.3%) 8 (66.7%) 1 (33.3%) 2 (66.7%) 0 (0.0%) 7 (100.0%) 1 (100.0%) 0 (0.0%)
Union 2 (100.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (NA) 0 (NA) 0 (NA) 0 (NA) 0 (NA) 0 (NA)
Total 502 (65.8%) 261 (34.2%) 123 (60.6%) 80 (39.4%) 91 (41.6%) 128 (58.4%) 40 (69.0%) 18 (31.0%)