Table 2. Summary diagnostic accuracy data for included studies.
| SN | Study | TP | FP | TN | FN | Sensitivity | Specificity | LR(+) | LR(-) | DOR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Diao,2021 | 152 | 0 | 50 | 49 | 0.756 | 1.000 | - | 0.244 | - |
| 2 | Agrawal,2021 | 26 | 2 | 436 | 3 | 0.897 | 0.995 | 196.345 | 0.104 | 1889.333 |
| 3 | Kim,2021 | 94 | 0 | 100 | 6 | 0.940 | 1.000 | - | 0.060 | - |
| 4 | Nalumansi,2020 | 63 | 13 | 159 | 27 | 0.700 | 0.924 | 9.262 | 0.325 | 28.538 |
| 5 | Boum,2021 | 170 | 54 | 745 | 121 | 0.584 | 0.932 | 8.644 | 0.446 | 19.383 |
| 6 | Pena-Rodriguez,2021 | 79 | 0 | 265 | 25 | 0.760 | 1.000 | - | 0.240 | - |
| 7 | Gupta,2021 | 63 | 1 | 252 | 14 | 0.818 | 0.996 | 207.000 | 0.183 | 1134.000 |
| 8 | Chaimayo,2020 | 59 | 5 | 389 | 1 | 0.983 | 0.987 | 77.487 | 0.017 | 4590.200 |
| 9 | Shrestha,2020 | 40 | 0 | 66 | 7 | 0.851 | 1.000 | - | 0.149 | - |
| 10 | Ristic,2021 | 25 | 0 | 77 | 18 | 0.581 | 1.000 | - | 0.419 | - |
| 11 | Thakur,2021 | 29 | 1 | 592 | 55 | 0.345 | 0.998 | 204.726 | 0.656 | 312.145 |
| 12 | Kanaujia,2021 | 136 | 2 | 293 | 53 | 0.720 | 0.993 | 106.138 | 0.282 | 375.925 |
TP = True Positive, FP = False Positive, TN = True Negative, FN = False Negative, LR(+) = Positive Likelihood Ratio, LR(-) = Negative Likelihood Ratio.