Table 1.
Optimization of the Oxysulfenylationa
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
| entry | change from standard conditions | yield (%) | ee (%) |
| 1 | L1 | 68 | |
| 2 | none (first optimal) | 86 | 90 |
| 3 | L3 | 73 | −90 |
| 4 | DCE, 105 °C | 70 | 91 |
| 5b | 15 mol % [Cu] (second optimal) | 87 | 90 |
| 6c | 10 mol % [Cu] | 59 | ND |
| 7 | 75 mol % Ph2S2 | 60d | ND |
| 8 | dry air, no K2CO3 | 42 (47)e | 91 |
| 9 | 100% O2, no K2CO3 | 14 (49)e | ND |
| 10 | no oxidant | 21 (70)e | ND |
| 11 | 1 mmol scale | 62 | 85 |
Reaction run on 0.1 mmol of 1a, in PhCF3 (0.1 M w/r 1a) in a sealed tube in a 120 °C oil bath under argon unless otherwise noted. The isolated yield is reported following flash chromatography on silica gel. Enantiomeric excess was measured by chiral HPLC.
18 mol % L2 was used.
13 mol % L2 was used.
Conversion determined by analysis of crude 1H NMR. Remainder is substrate 1a.
Isolated recovered substrate 1a in parentheses. ND = not determined.