Vertical eye movements were measured in response to static gratings to calculate eye drifts for baseline subtraction. (
A) Example raw eye trace over 22 s of a static grating. The calculated position of the eye drifts downward over time, which could reflect true eye movements or a calibration error in our recording configuration. These two possibilities cannot be disambiguated (see ‘Materials and methods’). The magnitude of eye position drift during static gratings is approximately 18-fold less than the magnitude of the eye movements elicited by high-contrast drifting gratings. (
B) Distribution of instantaneous eye velocity across N = 5 animals for the 20 s prior to the onset of all drifting grating stimuli (unidirectional and oscillating gratings at high [full] and low [20% relative] contrasts) used to evoke the optokinetic reflex (OKR). On average, there is a slight bias toward inferior (i.e., downward/negative) eye velocities during this baseline period, with a median velocity of –0.0787°/s. (
Bi) Full distribution. (
Bii) Same data, zoomed in on 0° to reveal the inferior bias. (
C–F) Absolute vertical position of the eye without drift correction (
C) prior to stimulus onset (when the drift was calculated as in [
B], includes data from high (full) and low (20% relative) contrast, oscillating and unidirectional experiments), and during (
D) high-contrast oscillating gratings, (
E) superior unidirectional gratings and (
F) inferior unidirectional gratings. Absolute eye position is similar to that measured during baseline only for oscillating gratings. The eye moves to more extreme positions during unidirectional stimuli. For this reason, the baseline subtraction was only applied to eye movements measured in response to oscillating gratings. For all histograms, arrows mark the median of the distribution. Yellow arrow in (
D–F) marks the median of the distribution shown in (
C). See
Figure 8—figure supplement 4 for further data on eye drift in response to low-contrast gratings. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.