Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 6;12:e81360. doi: 10.7554/eLife.81360

Figure 5. The pCharme/MATR3 interaction in cardiomyocytes sustains developmental genes expression.

(A) Pie charts showing the percentage of MATR3 targets in CharmeKO downregulated, invariant, or upregulated differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Significance of enrichment or depletion was assessed with two-sided Fisher’s exact test, shown below. (B) MATR3 targets (%) in the GO categories enriching CharmeKO downregulated DEGs (Down-DEGs) (see also Figure 2A). (C) Profile heatmaps of differential MATR3 CLIP-seq peaks (CharmeWT vs. CharmeKO). Normalized mean read counts of both IP samples are shown only for significant (false discovery rate [FDR] < 0.05) ‘Gain’ and ‘Loss’ peaks. (D) Upper panel: histogram showing the distribution (%) of ‘Gain’ and ‘Loss’ MATR3 peaks in pCharme DEGs. Significance of enrichment was assessed with two-sided Fisher’s exact test. Lower panel: distribution of the subset (13 out of 20) of Down-DEGs with Loss peaks in the first three GO categories identified for downregulated genes (see also Figure 2A). (E) Left panel: schematic representation of primary cells extraction from CharmeWT hearts. Once isolated, cells were plated and transfected with the specific siRNA (si-Matr3) or control siRNA (si-SCR). See ‘Materials and methods’ for details. Right panel: RT-qPCR quantification of Matr3, Cacna1c, Notch3, Myo18b, and Rbm20 RNA levels in primary cardiac cells treated with si-SCR or si-Matr3. Data were normalized to Gapdh mRNA and represent mean ± SEM of (n=4) independent biological experiments. Data information: *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001, unpaired Student’s t-test.

Figure 5.

Figure 5—figure supplement 1. Study of MATR3 binding properties from MATR3 CLIP-seq CharmeWT and CharmeKO datasets.

Figure 5—figure supplement 1.

(A) Empirical cumulative distribution functions (ECDF) showing the RNA abundance of MATR3 targets in CharmeKO condition compared to the other expressed genes. Significance was determined using a two-sided Kolmogorov–Smirnov (KS) test. (B) Principal component analysis (PCA) plot of CharmeWT and CharmeKO MATR3 CLIP-seq peaks. Plot was obtained from DiffBind package. See ‘Materials and methods’ for details. (C) Heatmap visualization of CharmeWT and CharmeKO MATR3 CLIP-seq peaks. Plot was produced by DiffBind package. Z-score of normalized reads counts is shown. See ‘Materials and methods’ for details. (D) Positional enrichment analysis of MATR3 motif in differential MATR3 CLIP-seq peaks (CharmeWT vs. CharmeKO). For each analyzed position close to peak summit, line plot displays the median CLIP-seq signal (FPM, IP1 + IP2) while heatmap displays the log2 odds ratio of UUCUU motif enrichment. Significant enrichments (Bonferroni corrected p-value<0.05) are shown in red (seeee ‘Materials and methods’ for further details). CLIP-seq signal in CharmeKO and CharmeWT conditions is displayed for ‘Gain’ and ‘Loss’ peaks, respectively.