Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Mar 17.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Psychophysiol. 2022 Jun 6;178:34–42. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2022.06.004

Table 4.

Summary of results from multi-level models testing associations between CRN and ERN mean amplitudes and EMA indices of emotional functioning in youth diagnosed with anxiety disorders.

B SE t p
Momentary NE
Intercept 1.28 (1.20; 1.36) 0.04 30.50 <0.001
Time 0.01 (−0.00; 0.02) 0.01 1.15 0.252
Age 0.02 (1.20; 1.36) 0.0 1.48 0.141
Sex 0.02 (−0.01; 0.11) 0.04 0.48 0.630
CRN −0.01 (−0.02; 0.01) 0.01 −0.75 0.456
ERN 0.01 (−0.00; 0.02) 0.01 0.97 0.334
Worry
Intercept 3.09 (2.82; 3.35) 0.13 23.00 <0.001
Time 0.04 (0.01; 0.07) 0.01 2.60 0.010
Age −0.09 (−0.18; 0.01) 0.05 −1.82 0.072
Sex 0.20 (−0.08; 0.48) 0.14 1.41 0.160
CRN −0.11 (−0.18; −0.04) 0.03 −3.22 0.002
ERN 0.02 (−0.03; 0.06) 0.02 0.85 0.399
Peak NE
Intercept 2.29 (2.14/2.44) 0.07 29.67 <0.001
Time 0.01 (−0.01; 0.02) 0.01 0.99 0.324
Age 0.00 (1.20; 1.36) 0.03 0.10 0.920
Sex −0.13 (−0.29; 0.03) 0.08 −1.57 0.118
CRN −0.05 (−0.08; −0.01) 0.01 −2.77 0.006
ERN 0.02 (−0.01; 0.04) 0.01 1.26 0.207

Notes: ERN: error-related negativity; CRN: correct-related negativity; EMA: ecological momentary assessment; NA: negative affect; B = unstandardized parameter estimate; SE = standard error, t = t-statistic; p = p-value. Age, CRN, and ERN were centered at the sample mean; time was centered at the start of the EMA assessment. Bolded values indicate p<.05.