Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol. 2022 Oct 3;15(2):e1853. doi: 10.1002/wnan.1853

TABLE 2.

Comparison of nanoparticle routes of administration into the brain

Routes of administration Advantages Disadvantages Applications
Systemic Favorable for diseases or tumors not limited to a single or easily accessible location Quick clearance, BBB transport Systemic glioblastoma targeting (Gregory et al., 2020)
Intracerebroventricular Effective biologic delivery rates, bypasses BBB Invasive, time-consuming Dopamine delivery for Parkinson’s disease, siRNA (targeting BACE1 and APP) delivery for Alzheimer’s disease, mRNA delivery to Astrocytes and brain neuronal cells (Monge-Fuentes et al., 2021; Shyam et al., 2015; Tanaka et al., 2018)
Intrathecal Moderate invasiveness, shortened recovery time, bypasses BBB Nanoparticle clearance prior to delivery Chronic pain prevention using NPs targeting neurokinin 1 receptor, delivery of frataxin mRNA for Friedreich’s ataxia (Nabhan et al., 2016; Ramírez-García et al., 2019)
Intranasal Noninvasiveness, bypasses BBB Lowest delivery rate Delivery of BMP4 to target brain tumors, delivery of AntagoNAT for upregulation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF; Mangraviti et al., 2016; Padmakumar, Jones, Khorkova, et al., 2021)