TABLE 2.
Comparison of nanoparticle routes of administration into the brain
| Routes of administration | Advantages | Disadvantages | Applications |
|---|---|---|---|
| Systemic | Favorable for diseases or tumors not limited to a single or easily accessible location | Quick clearance, BBB transport | Systemic glioblastoma targeting (Gregory et al., 2020) |
| Intracerebroventricular | Effective biologic delivery rates, bypasses BBB | Invasive, time-consuming | Dopamine delivery for Parkinson’s disease, siRNA (targeting BACE1 and APP) delivery for Alzheimer’s disease, mRNA delivery to Astrocytes and brain neuronal cells (Monge-Fuentes et al., 2021; Shyam et al., 2015; Tanaka et al., 2018) |
| Intrathecal | Moderate invasiveness, shortened recovery time, bypasses BBB | Nanoparticle clearance prior to delivery | Chronic pain prevention using NPs targeting neurokinin 1 receptor, delivery of frataxin mRNA for Friedreich’s ataxia (Nabhan et al., 2016; Ramírez-García et al., 2019) |
| Intranasal | Noninvasiveness, bypasses BBB | Lowest delivery rate | Delivery of BMP4 to target brain tumors, delivery of AntagoNAT for upregulation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF; Mangraviti et al., 2016; Padmakumar, Jones, Khorkova, et al., 2021) |