Table 2.
Epidemic impact with the threshold .
| 0.20 [0.20, 0.20] | 0.73 [0.73, 0.73] | 2.13 [2.13, 2.14] | ||
| 0.20 [0.20, 0.20] | 0.73 [0.73, 0.73] | 2.13 [2.13, 2.14] | ||
| 0.20 [0.20, 0.20] | 0.73 [0.73, 0.73] | 2.11 [2.11, 2.11] | ||
| 6.19 [6.17, 6.20] | 21.98 [21.97, 22.00] | 37.13 [37.11, 37.15] | ||
| 6.19 [6.17, 6.20] | 21.98 [21.96, 21.99] | 37.13 [37.12, 37.14] | ||
| 6.17 [6.16, 6.19] | 21.99 [21.97, 22.00] | 37.12 [37.11, 37.14] | ||
| 100 [100, 100] | 100 [100, 100] | 100 [100, 100] | ||
| 100 [100, 100] | 100 [100, 100] | 100 [100, 100] | ||
| 100[100, 100] | 100 [100, 100] | 100 [100, 100] | ||
Average values as a percentage of the total population N for and , and as a percentage of the size of the system V for the locked districts , together with 95 confidence interval in brackets for selected scenarios of values of under . NRS gives [2.15,2.15], [37.12, 37.16] and full invasion.