Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 1;8(1):100777. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100777

Table 2.

Treatment characteristics for group

Group Values, n (%)
A
 Gemcitabine 69 (53.5)
 FOLFIRINOX 29 (22.5)
 Capecitabine + gemcitabine 19 (14.7)
 Nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine 5 (3.9)
 Capecitabine 5 (3.9)
 Gem + paclitaxel 1 (0.8)
 FOLFOX 1 (0.8)
 Missing 1 (0.8)
Total patients, n 130
B
 Nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine 139 (54.7)
 FOLFIRINOX 69 (27.2)
 Gemcitabine 30 (11.8)
 PAXG 5 (2.0)
 PEXG 3 (1.2)
 GemOx 2 (0.8)
 Capecitabine/5-FU 2 (0.8)
 Gemcitabine + irinotecan 1 (0.4)
 Gemcitabine + capecitabine 1 (0.4)
 Irinotecan + oxaliplatin 1 (0.4)
 Gemcitabine + anetumab ravtansine 1 (0.4)
 Total patients, n 254
C
 Nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine 316 (70.5)
 Gemcitabine 71 (15.8)
 FOLFIRINOX 37 (8.3)
 GemOx 5 (1.1)
 CAPOX 2 (0.4)
 PAXG 2 (0.4)
 5-FU 2 (0.4)
 Nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine + LY3200882 2 (0.4)
 GemOx + olaparib 2 (0.4)
 Gemcitabine + anetumab ravtansine 2 (0.4)
 PEXG 1 (0.2)
 Nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine + BBI-608 1 (0.2)
 Irinotecan + nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine 1 (0.2)
 FOLFIRINOX → olaparib 1 (0.2)
 Gem + cisplatin 1 (0.2)
 FOLFOX 1 (0.2)
 IRINOX 1 (0.2)
 Missing 1 (0.2)
 Total patients, n 449

5-FU, fluorouracil; Gem, gemcitabine.