Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 13;8(1):100782. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2023.100782

Table 4.

Relative risk of grade ≥3 FP-related toxicity in DPYD variant carriers compared with wild type and in patients with elevated uracil concentrations (≥16 ng/ml) compared with normal values

DPYD genotype
Relative risk versus wild type in each group Intervention (DPYD-guided doses) Control group (normal dose)
DPYD∗2Aa 1 patient (grade 3 tox) 3.42 (2.2-5.29) (n = 8)
DPYD∗13 0.55 (0.15-2.00) (n = 3) 1 patient (no tox)
D949V 0.60 (0.10-3.65) (n = 6) 0.44 (0.03-6.11) (n = 3)
HapB3b 0.55 (0.15-1.99) (n = 13) 1.02 (0.53-2.01) (n = 30)
All DPYD variants 0.82 (0.37-1.82) (n = 22) 1.29 (0.77-2.18) (n = 42)
Uracil intervention group
Patients with ≥16 ng/ml versus normal uracil All patients, n = 200 Wild-type patients (normal dose), n = 180 DPYD variants (reduced doses) FP, n = 20
≥16 ng/ml 1.97 (1.13-3.44) (n = 13) 1.96 (1.09-3.54) (n = 11) 2.25 (0.44-11.52) (n = 2)
>150 ng/ml No patients found

All data reported with 95% confidence intervals.

FP, (5-fluorouracil, capecitabine, tegafur(S-1)); Tox, toxicity.

a

Includes one patient compound heterozygous for DPYD∗2A and HapB3.

b

Includes two patients homozygous for HapB3 and one patient compound heterozygous for DPYD∗2A and HapB3.