Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 17;6(3):e231887. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.1887

Table. Studies Included in the Systemic Review and Meta-analysis.

Source Study location Study design Age, y Duration of diabetes, y Prevalence of DR, No. (%) Sample size Diabetic retinopathy classification: No. (%) of participants Method of assessment Definition
Diagnosis of T2D Study enrollment
Eppens et al,42 2006 Western Pacific Cross-sectional Median (IQR), 12.0 (10.7 to 13.5)a Median (IQR), 14.9 (13.2 to 16.4)a Median (IQR), 2.3 (1.4 to 3.6)a 2 (0.6) 284 NR NR NR
Farah et al,43 2006 US Cross-sectional <21.0 Range, 10.0 to 21.0a Median (range), 1.8 (<2.0 to 15.0)a 1 (2.5) 40 Minimal NPDR: 1 (2.5) Fundoscopy Modified Airlie House
Unnikrishnan et al,44 2008 India Cross-sectional Mean (SD), 16.2 (2.9) Mean (SD), 18.9 (4.9) NR 0 36 NR Fundoscopy Background or proliferative retinopathy
Aulich et al,45 2019 Australia Cross-sectional NR Mean (SD), 15.1 (1.9)a Median (IQR), 1.8 (0.3 to 3.3)a 2 (6.7) 30 NR 7-Field stereoscopic fundus photography ETDRS
Khalil et al,46 2019 Egypt Cross-sectional Mean (SD), 18.0 (2.0) Mean (SD), 19.8 (1.1) Mean (SD), 2.5 (2.0) 0 13 NR Fundoscopy Normal fundus, nonproliferative retinopathy, or proliferative retinopathy
Ferm et al,47 2021 US Cross-sectional NR NR NR 13 (3.1) 416 NR Nonmydriatic fundus photography NR
Scott et al,48 2006 New Zealand Retrospective cohort NR Mean (SD), 20.0 (0.4) Mean (SD), 3.0 (0.3) 8 (7.6) 105 Mild to moderate NPDR: 4 (3.8); severe NPDR, PDR, or macular edema: 4 (3.8) Either fundoscopy or fundus photography (type NR) NR
Lee et al,49 2007 Japan Retrospective cohort NR NR NR 10 (27.8) 36 NR NR NR
Osman et al,50 2013 Sudan Retrospective cohort <10 y: 3 participants; 11 to 18 y: 35 participants NR NR 0 38 NR NR Medical records
Dart et al,51 2014 Canada Retrospective cohort Mean (SD), 13.5 (2.2) Mean (SD), 16.5 (2.3) Median (range), 4.4 (0 to 27.4) 40 (11.7) 342 NR NR Medical records
Geloneck et al,52 2015 US Retrospective cohort Mean (SD), 11.8 (2.7) Mean (SD), 14.5 (2.1) Mean (SD), 2.8 (2.3) 0 32 NR Fundoscopy Medical records
Newton et al,53 2015b New Zealand Retrospective cohort Range, 6.5 to 17.0c <17.0 0 1 (4.3) 23 NR NR Medical records
Wang et al,54 2017 US Retrospective cohort Median (IQR), 18.0 (16.0 to 21.0) NR Median (IQR), 3.1 (1.9 to 4.9) 127 (7.2) 1768 NPDR: 6 (0.3); PDR: 1 (0.1); unspecified: 120 (6.8) NR Medical records
Yeh and Bernardo,55 2017b US Retrospective cohort Mean, 13.8 NR NR 1 (7.1) 14 NR Fundoscopy Medical records
Koziol et al,56 2020 Poland Retrospective cohort NR <18.0 NR 79 (1.8) 4291 NR NR Medical records
Ek et al,57 2020 Sweden Retrospective cohort Mean (SD), 15.0 (1.9)a Mean (SD), 22.2 (3.7) Mean (SD), 6.7 (2.8) 32 (31.1) 103 NR Fundus photography (type NR) NR
Porter et al,58 2020 US Retrospective cohort Mean (SD), 17.0 (3.0) Mean (SD), 18.1 (2.6) Mean (SD), 1.1 (1.3) 3 (6.0) 50 Mild NPDR: 3 (6.0) NR ETDRS
Amutha et al,59 2021 India Retrospective cohort Mean (SD), 16.6 ( 2.5)a Mean (SD), 23.2 ( 9.7)a Median (IQR), 5.7 (NR to NR)a 118 (27.5) 429 NR Both fundoscopy (for initial screening) and 7-field stereoscopic fundus photography (for confirmation) ETDRS
Bai et al,60 2022 US Retrospective cohort Mean (SD), 17.3 (3.4) <22.0 Range, 0 to 15.0 17 (26.6) 64 NPDR: 11 (64.7); PDR: 4 (6.3); macular edema: 2 (3.2) NR Medical records
Eppens et al,12 2006 Australia Prospective cohort Median (IQR), 13.2 (11.6 to 15.0)a Median (IQR), 15.3 (13.6 to 16.4)a Median (IQR), 1.3 (0.6 to 3.1)a 1 (4.0) 25 NR 7-Field stereoscopic fundus photography Modified Airlie House
Shield et al,61 2009 Ireland; UK Prospective cohort Median (IQR), 13.6 (9.9 to 16.8)a Median (IQR), 14.5 (10.8 to 17.8)a Median, 1.0a 0 55 NR NR NR
Ruhayel et al,62 2010 Australia Prospective cohort Mean (SD), 11.6 (1.9)a Mean (SD), 16.8 (1.7)a Mean (SD), 5.2 (2.0)a 4 (25.0) 16 NPDR: 4 (25.0); 3 with unilateral hard exudates and 1 with dot hemorrhages NR Medical records
Jefferies et al,63 2012 New Zealand Prospective cohort Median (IQR), 12.9 (7.1 to 15.5) NR NR 0 52 NR NR NR
Schmidt et al,64 2012 Austria; Germany Prospective cohort Mean (SD), 13.5 (3.4) Mean (SD), 15.3 (3.0) NR 12 (1.8) 684 NR NR NR
Jensen et al,66 2021b US Prospective cohort <20.0 NR Mean (SD), 7.5 (2.1) 140 (31.3) 447 NR Fundus photography (type NR) NR
Mean (SD), 12.4 (2.1) 126 (55.0) 229 Mild NPDR: 91 (39.7); moderate NPDR: 26 (11.4); PDR: 9 (4.0)
Preechasuk et al,67 2022 Thailand Prospective cohort Mean (SD), 16.9 (6.4) Mean (SD), 23.4 (8.5) Median (IQR), 5.2 (1.6-9.4) 8 (9.0) 89 Mild to moderate NPDR: 4 (4.5); severe NPDR: 4 (4.5) NR Presence of any severity of DR, macular edema, vitreous hemorrhage, or tractional retinal detachment
TODAY Study Group,68 2013 US Prospective cohort NR Mean (SD), 18.1 (2.5) Mean (SD), 4.9 (1.5) 71 (13.7) 517 Minimal NPDR: 64 (12.3); mild NPDR: 7 (1.4) 7-Field stereoscopic fundus photography ETDRS
TODAY Study Group,65 2021 US Prospective cohort NR Mean (SD), 25.4 (2.5) Mean (SD), 12.0 (1.5) 210 (50.0) 420 Minimal NPDR: 95 (22.6); mild NPDR: 68 (16.2); moderate NPDR: 16 (3.8); moderately severe NPDR: 3 (0.7); severe NPDR: 5 (1.2); early or stable, treated PDR: 10 (2.4); high-risk PDR: 5 (1.2); macular edema: 14 (3.3) 7-Field stereoscopic fundus photography ETDRS
Zuckerman Levin et al,69 2022 Israel Prospective cohort Mean (SD), 14.7 (1.9) Mean (SD), 14.7 (1.9) At presentation: 0 At presentation: 4 (1.9) At presentation: 216 NR NR Progressive retinal changes (nonproliferative or proliferative)
At follow-up: mean (SD), 2.9 (2.1) At follow-up: 5 (4.6) At follow-up: 108

Abbreviations: DR, diabetic retinopathy; ETDRS, Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study; NPDR, nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy; NR, not reported; PDR, proliferative diabetic retinopathy; T2D, type 2 diabetes.

a

Represents value for whole cohort in study, not just patients screened for retinopathy.

b

Abstract only.

c

In this abstract, there was 1 participant with Prader-Willi syndrome who was diagnosed with T2D at age 6.5 years.