. 2023 Mar 15;41(3):93–103. doi: 10.1089/photob.2022.0161

Table 2.

Summary of Characteristics of 15 Articles

	Author	Year	System type (laser, LED)	Wavelength (nm)	Laser power (W)	Beam area/spot size (cm²)	Treatment time (sec) - per point	Treatment time (sec) - per visit
1	Abohabib	2018	Laser	940	1.7	2.83^a	60	60^a
2	Bozkaya	2021	Laser	830	0.126	0.0028	3	60
3	Ekizer	2016	LED	618	—	—	1200^b	1200^b
4	Elsyad	2019	Laser	940	0.25^b	0.004	60	360
5	Garcia	2012	Laser	830	0.086^b	0.0028	3	60^a
6	Gokmenoglu	2014	LED	626	0.185	4.8	1200^b	1200^a
7	Kinalski	2021	Laser	808	0.05^b	0.4	80	480^a
8	Lobato	2019	Laser	808	0.05^b	0.4	83	498^a
9	Matys	2019	Laser	635	0.1^a	0.5024	40	80^a
10	Matys	2020	Laser	635	0.1^a	0.5024	40	80^a
11	Memarian	2018	Laser	810	0.05	1	400	400^a
			LED	626	0.185^b	4.8	1200^b	1200
12	Osman	2017	Laser	910	0.7	—	60	60^a
13	Palled	2021	Laser	1064	0.033^a	0.28^a	60	60^a
14	Sleem	2019	Laser	830	0.1^b	0.28	30	60^b
15	Torkzaban	2017	Laser	940	0.1^b	0.28	40	80^a

(—) indicates a value that cannot be derived from other reported values.

^{^a}

Indicates value was not reported in the literature and calculated by the authors with values given in the article.

^{^b}

Indicates value that was initially misreported and corrected by the authors' calculations.

LED, light emitting diode.