Table 3. Changes in textural cutting force across the various marinated grilled beef entrecôte meat samples compared to control.
nr | Antioxidant additive | Type of marinade | Percentage of antioxidant additive | Beef nutting force (N) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | CP | Control | 0.0 | 67.5bcde ± 7.2 |
2 | 0.5 | 59.7abcde ± 4.8 | ||
3 | 1.0 | 69.5cde ± 11.8 | ||
4 | 1.5 | 57.6abcde ± 15.9 | ||
5 | AS | 0.0 | 68.7cde ± 5.2 | |
6 | 0.5 | 35.6a ± 4.0 | ||
7 | 1.0 | 37.2ab ± 1.5 | ||
8 | 1.5 | 66.9bcde ± 11.5 | ||
9 | IM | 0.0 | 35.2a ± 5.8 | |
10 | 0.5 | 59.2abcde ± 24.4 | ||
11 | 1.0 | 81.9de ± 15.3 | ||
12 | 1.5 | 84.7e ± 10.3 | ||
13 | GP | Control | 0.0 | 81.5de ± 23.5 |
14 | 0.5 | 70.1cde ± 29.0 | ||
15 | 1.0 | 59.7abcde ± 10.8 | ||
16 | 1.5 | 60.9abcde ± 14.9 | ||
17 | AS | 0.0 | 68.7cde ± 5.2 | |
18 | 0.5 | 83.8de ± 21.1 | ||
19 | 1.0 | 62.0abcde ± 8.6 | ||
20 | 1.5 | 47.9abc ± 4.3 | ||
21 | IM | 0.0 | 35.2a ± 5.8 | |
22 | 0.5 | 40.6abc ± 11.8 | ||
23 | 1.0 | 67.5bcde ± 8.0 | ||
24 | 1.5 | 56.6abcde ± 2.6 | ||
25 | BS | Control | 0.0 | 64.9abcde ± 27.4 |
26 | 0.5 | 42.6abc ± 8.6 | ||
27 | 1.0 | 66.8bcde ± 10.6 | ||
28 | 1.5 | 68.0cde ± 31.5 | ||
29 | AS | 0.0 | 68.7cde ± 5.2 | |
30 | 0.5 | 59.6abcde ± 7.9 | ||
31 | 1.0 | 70.3cde ± 27.9 | ||
32 | 1.5 | 53.5abcd ± 6.2 | ||
33 | IM | 0.0 | 35.2a ± 5.8 | |
34 | 0.5 | 61.9abcde ± 34.9 | ||
35 | 1.0 | 54.3abcde ± 4.4 | ||
36 | 1.5 | 60.7abcde ± 7.8 |
Note:
Results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Results followed by the same lowercase letter(s) in the column of cutting force do not differ significantly (p > 0.05). African spice, AS; Industrial marinade/pickle, IM; CP, Cranberry pomace; GP, Grape pomace; BS, Baikal skullcap.