Table 2.
Summary of detection techniques used for CRC detection based on cost-effectiveness.
| Techniques used | Sensitivity | Specificity | Cost effectiveness | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colonoscopy | 95% | 88–98% | Higher cost when compared to other methods. | (54) |
| Sigmoidoscopy | 95% | 87% | More affordable than a colonoscopy | (59) |
| Colon Capsule Endoscopy | 76.7% | 90.7% | More expensive than a colonoscopy | (12) |
| g-FOBT | 96–98% | 50–75% | More affordable than a colonoscopy | (12) |
| FITs | 94% | 74% | More affordable than a colonoscopy | (70) |
| stool DNA testing | 85% | 93% | More expensive than a FITs | (64) |
| Computed tomography colonography | 66.7–93.5% | 96.0–97.9% | More affordable than a colonoscopy. | (65) |
| DCBE | 80% | 95% | Almost same as colonoscopy | (66) |
| Serological tests | 68% | 79% | More affordable than a colonoscopy | (69, 70) |