Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 21;6(3):e1757. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.1757

TABLE 4.

Correlation of NOTCH1 and SF3B1 mutations with genomic change components to assess the prognostic status of the disease

NOTCH1 SF3B1
Total patients Mutated Wildtype Mutated Wildtype
No % No % No % Sig‐No No % No % Sig‐No
Deletion11q22 Positive 7 14 1 14 6 86 1 3 43 4 57 0.095·
Negative 44 86 7 16 37 84 6 14 38 86
Trisomy12 Positive 28 55 5 18 23 82 0.715 6 21 22 79 0.487
Negative 23 45 3 13 20 87 3 13 20 87
Deletion13q14,q34 Positive 27 53 5 19 22 81 0.707 2 7 25 93 0.066·
Negative 24 47 3 13 21 88 7 29 17 71
Deletion17p13 Positive 7 14 3 43 4 57 0.068· 0 0 7 100 0.328
Negative 44 86 5 11 39 89 9 20 35 80
Dual changes Positive 13 25 3 23 10 77 0.404 4 31 9 69 0.208
Negative 38 75 5 13 33 87 5 13 33 87
Complex Positive 5 10 2 40 3 60 0.17 0 0 5 100 0.571
Negative 46 90 6 13 40 87 9 20 37 80
Karyotype abnormality Present 14 70 1 7 13 93 0.521 2 14 12 86 0.549
Absent 6 30 1 17 5 83 2 33 4 67
Stimulation efficiency grade 2 6 30 1 17 5 83 0.3 2 33 4 67 0.508
3 10 50 0 0 10 100 1 10 9 90
4 4 20 1 25 3 75 1 25 3 75
Proliferation grade 3 2 10 0 0 2 100 1 1 50 1 50 0.368
4 18 90 2 11 16 89 3 17 15 83
Banding grade 3 2 10 0 0 2 100 1 0 0 2 100 1
4 18 90 2 11 16 89 4 22 14 78
Staging genetic and prognostic immunophenotyping marker A 15 29 0 0 15 100 0.015· 0 0 15 100 0.008··
B 9 18 0 0 9 100 0 0 9 100
C 27 53 8 30 19 70 9 33 18 67

Abbreviations: TS(·), tendency to significant; S(··), significant.