Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Mar 7.
Published in final edited form as: Cell Metab. 2023 Mar 7;35(3):386–413. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2023.02.002
Conventional technologies for studies of adipose tissue
Whole tissue technologies Pros Cons
Microscopy (immunostaining/RN A FISH)
  • Preservation of 2D/3D structure of tissue
  • Cellular structure and position linked to protein/RNA expression
  • Detection of few proteins/RNA
  • Hypothesis-biased
Bulk tissue omics
  • Genome-wide quantification of transcriptome/epigenome/lipidome/metabol ome
  • Unbiased detection
  • High dynamic range
  • No cell-type or spatial resolution
Studies of cell types
FACS
  • Sorting of primary cell types
  • /subpopulations
  • Retrieval of live cells for further studies
  • Cell sorting based on few markers
  • Hypothesis-biased
  • Stressful sorting conditions
  • Challenging for adipocyte (size and fragility)
Genetic lineage tracing
  • In vivo cell type specific tracing
  • Limitation of single CRE drivers for labelling of specific cell types
  • Unwanted physiological effect from CRE-inducing agent
  • Lack of quantitative output
Cell culture models
  • Well-defined culture conditions
  • Immortalization enables high sample yield
  • Ease of mechanistic studies
  • Lack of signals from tissue microenvironme nt
  • Culture conditions masking biology