Skip to main content
. 2022 Nov 20;101(2):124–137. doi: 10.1111/tan.14880

TABLE 1.

HLA allele association with active TB

No. participants with allele No. participants lacking allele
HLA allele a HLA allele frequency (%) Active TB QFT+ & QFT‐ Active TB QFT+ & QFT‐ Odds ratio P‐value b Corrected p‐value Population coverage (%)
DQA1*03:01 7.1 24 21 75 516 7.9 8.0 E‐10 6.9 E‐08 26.4
DPB1*04:02 10.3 25 40 74 495 4.2 2.0 E‐06 1.7 E‐04 19.2
DRB4*01:01 27.0 42 127 57 401 2.3 0.0003 0.03 47.4 c
DPB1*105:01 25.6 12 150 87 385 0.4 0.0006 0.05 0.1 d
A*23:17 6.8 0 43 99 494 0.0 0.0008 >0.05 0.0 e
DQA1*01:05 5.3 0 34 99 503 0.0 0.006 >0.05 2.3
DRB1*11:01 12.9 21 61 78 474 2.1 0.01 >0.05 10.5
DQA1*03:03 21.7 13 125 86 412 0.5 0.02 >0.05 6.9
B*15:03 9.9 16 47 83 489 2.0 0.03 >0.05 1.3
DQB1*02:01 15.4 8 90 90 447 0.4 0.03 >0.05 23.0
DRB1*03:01 17.5 10 101 89 434 0.5 0.04 >0.05 17.8
DRB1*07:01 17.8 25 88 74 447 1.7 0.04 >0.05 18.2
a

When no result was obtained for a particular locus those participants were excluded from the calculations, the total number of participants for each allele does therefore not add up to 636, or ATB (n = 99), and QFT ± (n = 537, where QFT + (n = 334), and QFT − (n = 203)).

b

Bonferroni corrected threshold for a significant p‐value = 0.0006.

c

Coverage based in linkage with DR4, 7, and 9 alleles.

d

Rare worldwide, but 25.4% in South African Black and 20% in Brazilian Black.

e

Rare worldwide, but 7.7% in South African Black and 8% in Brazilian Black.