Skip to main content
. 2022 Dec 12;12(5):5506–5516. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5378

TABLE 4.

Effect of Sleeve application when Lymphoedema (RAVI > 10%) developed

Variable Change from pre‐surgery a , EMM (95% CI) p‐value
n No sleeve n Sleeve
FACT‐B at 12 months 11 2.95 (−1.66, 7.56) 14 11.80 (7.71, 15.88) 0.007
TOI at 12 months 12 0.41 (−4.13, 4.95) 14 6.84 (2.63, 11.04) 0.042
ARM at 12 months 12 −3.17 (−5.26, −1.08) 13 −3.92 (−5.93, −1.91) 0.60
FACT‐B at 18 months 12 −2.96 (−10.82, 4.89) 14 4.69 (−2.58, 11.96) 0.15
TOI at 18 months 13 −3.82 (−9.84, 2.20) 14 2.18 (−3.62, 7.98) 0.15
ARM at 18 months 11 −2.44 (−4.32, −0.55) 14 −3.58 (−5.26, −1.91) 0.36
FACT‐B at 24 months 13 0.30 (−8.04, 8.63) 13 4.71 (−3.63, 13.04) 0.46
TOI at 24 months 13 −0.38 (−6.19, 5.43) 13 1.90 (−3.91, 7.71) 0.58
ARM at 24 months 11 −2.10 (−4.87, 0.68) 12 −4.41 (−7.07, −1.75) 0.22

Note: In patients in either arm the use of a sleeve once lymphoedema occurred improved QoL with increased FACT‐B and TOI scores at 12 but not 18 months. Conventionally a 5‐point increase in scores is considered clinically relevant.

Abbreviation: EMM, estimated marginal mean.

a

Calculated using an ANCOVA model with later time point as the dependent variable and pre‐surgery value and randomisation group as independent variables.