LepRLH neurons limit water intake despite thirst
(A) Representative Ca2+ traces. Scale bar, x = 50 s, y = 0.5 SD.
(B) Proportion of neurons responsive to water exposure. Total, n = 263; water-responsive, n = 127 neurons, 5 mice, 2 imaging days. ∗∗∗p < 0.001, Pearson’s χ2 test.
(C) Proportion of water-excited (We) and water-inhibited neurons (Wi). Ad libitum: total, n = 111; We, n = 10; Wi, n = 27; water deprived: total, n = 152; We, n = 30; Wi, n = 60 neurons, 5 mice. ns, p = 0.053; ∗p = 0.0288, Pearson’s χ2 test for equality of proportions.
(D and E) Optogenetic activation for 10 min in free access enclosure following water deprivation.
(D) Time spent at water location. YFP, n = 8; ChR, n = 8 mice. ∗∗p = 0.0094, Mann-Whitney U test.
(E) Water intake. YFP, n = 8; ChR, n = 7 mice. ∗∗p = 0.0035, Student’s t test.
(F and G) Neural response to deprived stimulus.
(F) Example map of the same neurons detected following acute food or water deprivation. Scale bar reflects amplitude of Ca2+ signal at stimulus location.
(G) Response of individual neurons to deprived stimulus following acute food or water deprivation. n = 75 neurons, 5 mice. Inset: ns, p = 0.94; paired Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
(H) Relative intake during 10 min of optogenetic activation in free access enclosure. As in (E), ns, p = 0.43; Mann-Whitney U test.
Data shown are mean ± SEM. ns, not significant; ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001.
See also Figures S5 and S8.