Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Nov 22.
Published in final edited form as: ChemSusChem. 2022 Oct 26;15(22):e202200888. doi: 10.1002/cssc.202200888

Table 5.

Comparison of turnover numbers as observed in different studies using electrochemical regeneration methods.

Electrode Catalyst/mediator Substrate TNcofactor Ref.
ZrO2-coated FTO Cp*RhIII(bpy complex CO2 79[a] [162]
glassy carbon cobaltocene modified PAA/Diaphorse formaldehyde 5.2[b] [161]
Bucky paper Cp*RhIII(bpy complex d-fructose 2.6[a] [160]
carbon paper ethyl carboxy viologen/diaphorase pyruvate <1[b] [172]
ITO ferredoxin NADP reductase pyruvate 936[a] [184]
Cu Cp*RhIII(bpy complex CO2 6.4[b] [156]
carbon cloth cobaltocene modified PAA/Diaphorse ethyl 4-chloroacetoacetate 30[b] [196]
graphite MV2+/AMAPOR 2-oxoglutarate/NH4+ 1000[a] [197]
carbon plate MV2+/diaphorase pyruvic acid/CO2 18000[a] [198]
Au-Hg MV2+/diaphorase benzoylformate 158[a] [199]
carbon Felt Cp*RhIII(bpy complex acetophenone 64[a] [200]
glassy carbon BPV-LPEI/diaphorase acetoacetyl coenzyme A 8[b] [201]
[a]

Used directly from reference

[b]

Calculated from data provided in reference.