a: Comparative uptake of PS 1, 3, 5
(formulated either in Tween or Pluronic) in tumor, liver and skin (SCID mice
bearing UMUC3 and T24 tumors) at a dose of 0.47 μmol/kg)) at variable
time points (λex: 675 nm, λem: 720), using
the IVIS optical imaging system.
b: Comparative in vivo PDT efficacy
(long-term antitumor activity) of PS with and without erlotinib conjugates.
(A): PS 1 (non-erlotinib PS), (B): PS
3 erlotinib moiety is attached at position-3 of the PS
(C): PS 5, erlotinib moiety is attached at
position-17 of the PS. PS 1, 3, and 5 were
individually injected (dose: 0.47 micromole/Kg) to SCID mice bearing UMUC-3
tumors at the flank. Mice were exposed to light (665 nm, 135 J/cm2,
75 mW/cm2) at 24 h post-injection (optimal uptake time) and tumor
re-growth was monitored daily. These results suggest that position of the
erlotinib moiety in the PS makes a remarkable difference in long-term tumor
cure.
c: Comparative tumor necrosis of mice injected with
(A) PS 3 (effective PDT agent), and
(B) PS 5 that showed limited efficacy at 72h
post-light exposure. Mice were treated under similar drug and light doses. Dug
dose: 0.47 μmol/kg, light dose: 135 J/cm2, 75
mW/cm2 and the tumors were exposed to light (665 nm) at 24h
post-injection of the PS.