Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Cytopathol. 2022 Mar 17;130(8):609–619. doi: 10.1002/cncy.22571

Table 3.

Analysis of determinants for non-diagnostic pediatric salivary gland FNA.

Characteristic Diagnostic FNA (n=88) Non-diagnostic FNA (n=18) P value*
Age (mean [range]) (y) 13.1 (0–21) 13.4 (0–21) 0.276
Male:female 43:45 8:10 0.606
Anatomic site
 Parotid 64/88, 73% 16/18, 89% 0.233
 Submandibular 22/88, 25% 2/18, 11% 0.233
 Other 2/88, 2% 0/18, 0 1
Size (mean [range]) (cm) 2.5 (0.5–7.3) 2.9 (1.2–7.1) 0.610
Type of FNA procedure
 Palpation-guided 39/78, 50% 13/16, 81% 0.028
 Ultrasound-guided 37/78, 47% 3/16, 19% 0.051
 CT-guided 2/78, 3% 0/16, 0 1
FNA proceduralist
 Cytopathologist 37/78, 47% 12/16, 75% 0.056
 Interventional radiologist 34/78, 44% 4/16, 25% 0.263
 Otolaryngologist 7/78, 9% 0/16, 0 0.599
FNA procedure location
 Outpatient clinic 39/78, 50% 11/15, 73% 0.156
 Radiology suite 35/78, 45% 4/15, 73% 0.257
 Operating room 4/78, 5% 0/15, 0 1
Sedation 26/77, 34% 3/15, 20% 0.374
ROSE performed 73/77, 95% 16/18, 89% 1
 Inadequate 24/73, 33% 15/16, 94% <0.001
FNA passes (mean [range]) 2.8 (1–7) 2.9 (1–4) 0.667
Malignancy
 Based on histologic follow-up 15/49, 31% 0/5, 0 0.306
 Based on all follow-up* 17/84, 20% 0/17, 0 0.069
Neoplasm
 Based on histologic follow-up 33/49, 67% 3/5, 60% 1
 Based on all follow-up* 35/84, 42% 3/17, 18% 0.098
Cystic, vascular or diffuse lesions
 Based on histologic follow-up 4/49, 8% 1/5, 20% 0.397
 Based on all follow-up* 18/84, 21% 9/17, 53% 0.014

FNA, fine‐needle aspiration; ROSE, rapid onsite evaluation;

*

Mann–Whitney U test was used for analysis of patient age and lesion size, whereas Fisher’s exact test was used for analysis of all other parameters.