Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 22;38(1):134–141. doi: 10.4266/acc.2022.00955

Table 3.

Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of average GRV of ultrasonography for predicting feeding intolerance

Ultrasonographic vs. manual aspiration Sensitivity (95% CI), % Specificity (95% CI), % AUC (95% CI), % Positive predictive value (95% CI), % Negative predictive value (95% CI), % Diagnostic accuracy, %
Feeding intolerance 66.67 (9.43–99.16) 98.15 (90.11–99.95) 0.82 (0.70–0.91) 66.67 (9.43–99.16) 98.15 (90.11–99.95) 96.49
Average GRV (≤0.8 ml/kg) 89.66 (78.83–96.11) 76.58 (71.06–81.51) 0.83 (0.79–0.87) 45.22 (35.92–54.77) 97.17 (93.94–98.95) 78.90
Average GRV (>0.8 ml/kg) 75.00 (47.62–92.73) 92.28 (88.74–94.99) 0.84 (0.79–0.87) 33.33 (18.56–50.97) 98.63 (96.52–99.62) 91.44

GRV: gastric reserve volume; CI: confidence interval; AUC: area under the curve.