Table 1.
Study | Lanas 201516 | Lee 202117 | Lin 201122 | Maruyama 201825 | Moayyedi 201918 | Ray 201624 | Ray 201823 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
Primary study design | Case-control study with prospective case ascertainment | Retrospective cohort study | Retrospective, population-based, nested case-control study | Retrospective cohort study | 3 × 2 partial factorial double-blind trial, with simultaneous randomization to 1 of 3 antithrombotic drug regimens, and to PPI vs placebo | Retrospective cohort study | Retrospective cohort study |
Anticoagulants | Not stated | Warfarin, rivaroxaban, dabigatran, apixaban, edoxaban; DOACs included both regular and reduced dosing | Warfarin | Dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or apixaban | Group 1: rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily with aspirin 100 mg/d Group2: rivaroxaban 5 mg twice daily* | Warfarin | Apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, warfarin |
Antisecretory agent | Any PPI | Any prescription PPI | Current use of any PPI (initiated at least 1 month before index date) Current use of any H2RA (initiated at least 1 month before index date) | Any PPI | Pantoprazole 40 mg/d | Any prescription PPI | Any prescription PPI |
Comparator | No PPI | No PPI | No PPI (in prior year); no H2RA (in prior year) | No PPI | Placebo | No PPI | No PPI |
Country, time period | Spain, 2009 to mid- 2013 | Korea, with patients initiating anticoagulant between January 2010 and April 2018 | UK, January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2007 | Japan, prescribed anticoagulant between April 2011 and November 2015 | 580 centers in 33 countries, randomization March 2013 through May 2016 | United States, Tennessee Medicaid 1996–2011 and 5% national Medicare Sample 2011–2013 | United States, January 1, 2011 to September 30, 2015 |
Source population | A network of general hospitals integrated within the Spanish Association of Gastroenterology and the Biomedical Investigation Network Center of hepatic and digestive diseases | Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment database, which includes the entire South Korean population | THIN database: UK primary care record database with >3 million patients | Single institution | — | Patients receiving Tennessee Medicaid and the 5% National Medicare Sample | Medicare beneficiaries |
Inclusion and exclusion criteria | Inclusion: Age 20–90 years Exclusion: liver disease, coagulation disorders or malignancy within the previous 5 years; bleeding caused by gastroesophageal or intestinal varices, GI cancer, Mallory-Weiss lesions, associated coagulopathy, and esophagitis; patients with unreliable sources of information; patients refusing participation; patients with inhospital bleeding. |
Inclusion: Atrial fibrillation, initiated oral anticoagulant between January 2010 and April 2018, with a prior history of upper GI bleeding before oral anticoagulant initiation Exclusion: Patients prescribed an oral anticoagulant within 1 year before the study period (January 2009-December 2009), patients <20 years old, diagnosis of valvular atrial fibrillation, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, end-stage renal disease, or joint replacement |
Inclusion: Age 40–84 years, enrolled with primary care provider for 2 years, prescription data for 1 year Exclusion for source population: Diagnosis of cancer, esophageal varices, Mallory-Weiss disease, alcohol abuse, liver disease, or coagulopathy For cases, no exclusion criteria could be met in the 2 months after the recorded upper GI bleed, and no discharge from the hospital in the month prior to the upper GI bleed |
Inclusion: Age ≥18 years, prescribed anticoagulant for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation Exclusion: None stated. |
Inclusion: Stable atherosclerotic cardiovascular or peripheral arterial disease with no clinical need for PPI. Patients with coronary artery disease <65 years old additionally required to have arterial disease involving 2 vascular beds or 2 additional risk factors. Exclusions: high risk of bleeding from any site, severe heart failure, significant renal impairment, need for dual antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy, known hypersensitivity to any of the study drugs. |
Inclusion: Age ≥30 years, first prescription for warfarin filled during study period, complete demographic information, full pharmacy benefits, ≥1 outpatient visit and ≥1 filled prescription in past year Exclusion: Prescription of oral anticoagulant in preceding year, end-stage renal disease, serious GI illness predisposing to bleeding, or bleeding-related hospitalization in past year. |
Inclusion: Age ≥30 years, initiated oral anticoagulant during study period, complete demographic information in Medicare files, full pharmacy benefits, ≥1 outpatient visit and ≥1 filled prescription in past year. Exclusion: Prescription of oral anticoagulant in preceding year, end-stage renal disease, serious GI illness predisposing to bleeding, or bleeding-related hospitalization in past year. |
Entire study sample analyzed versus subset who were anticoagulated | Subset | Entire study sample | Subset | Entire study sample | Subset | Entire study sample | Entire study sample |
Case definition for upper gastrointestinal bleeding | Hospitalization for GI bleeding (hematemesis, melena, hematochezia, or red blood per rectum). Classified as upper GI bleeding if witnessed hematemesis by hospital staff or either blood in the stomach or a lesion with stigmata of bleeding at upper endoscopy. | Occurrence of an ICD-10 code for upper GI bleeding during an admission that lasted at least 3 days. | Bleeding in stomach or duodenum | Overt “actionable” bleeding, defined as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) types 2–5. Anatomic sites considered upper GI bleeding not stated. | Two definitions were examined:† a: Overt bleeding of gastroduodenal origin (hematemesis or melena) with actively bleeding gastroduodenal lesion (peptic ulcer or neoplasia) confirmed by endoscopy or radiography b: Overt upper gastrointestinal bleeding of unknown origin (hematemesis with or without melena thought to be related to upper gastrointestinal tract) |
Hospitalization for upper gastrointestinal bleeding that was potentially preventable by PPI, including bleeding related to esophagitis, peptic ulcer disease, and gastritis. | Hospitalization for upper gastrointestinal bleeding that was potentially preventable by PPI, including bleeding related to esophagitis, peptic ulcer disease, and gastritis. |
Newcastle Ottawa Scale for observational studies† | |||||||
Selection, max 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 1 | n/a | 4 | 4 |
Comparability, max 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | |
Exposure (for case-control studies)/Outcome (for cohort studies), max 3 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | |
Cochrane Risk of Bias for RCTs (max 6) | — | — | — | — | Low risk of bias in all 6 categories | — | — |
DOAC = direct-acting oral anticoagulant; GI = gastrointestinal; H2RA = histamine-2 receptor antagonist; PPI = proton pump inhibitor; RCT = randomized controlled trial.
Participants were also randomized to an aspirin-only group; however, this arm of the trial did not meet the inclusion criteria for the systematic review so data are not presented.
The trial’s primary efficacy outcome was defined as a composite of upper GI clinical events, which also included occult bleeding (drop in the hemoglobin of ≥2 g/dL), symptomatic gastroduodenal ulcers with at least 3 days of gastrointestinal pain, or ≥5 gastroduodenal erosions (confirmed by endoscopy) with at least 3 days of GI pain, upper GI obstruction, or perforation. Data are presented here only for the 2 components of the composite endpoint that included upper GI bleeding.