Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 8;15:1068943. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2023.1068943

Table 4.

Two-way ANOVA results of haemodynamic responses of ROIs during different tasks among the PD-FOG, PD-nFOG, and HC groups.

PD-FOG (N = 12) PD-nFOG (N = 10) HC (N = 12) Group effects PD-FOG vs. PD-nFOG PD-FOG vs. HC PD-nFOG vs. HC Task effects NS vs. NT NT vs. FT NS vs. FT Task performance time
Mean ± SD p values
∆HBO2 in each ROI (μmol/L)
PFC NS 0.07 ± 0.28 0.38 ± 0.49 0.3 ± 0.35
NT 0.21 ± 0.32 0.33 ± 0.16 0.21 ± 0.25 0.034* 0.009* 0.199 0.150 0.249 0.948 0.136 0.128 0.01*
FT 0.26 ± 0.24 0.31 ± 0.27 0.22 ± 0.23
SMA NS 0.00 ± 0.21 0.14 ± 0.15 −0.07 ± 0.19
NT 0.13 ± 0.17 0.14 ± 0.11 −0.03 ± 0.3 0.027* 0.161 0.182 0.007* 0.041* 0.232 0.117 0.012* 0.186
FT 0.12 ± 0.15 0.15 ± 0.14 0.12 ± 0.3
PMC NS 0.00 ± 0.21 0.15 ± 0.13 −0.04 ± 0.26
NT 0.11 ± 0.14 0.21 ± 0.11 0.10 ± 0.23 0.025* 0.010* 0.633 0.030# 0.003* 0.028# 0.123 0.001* 0.038*
FT 0.12 ± 0.12 0.18 ± 0.1 0.19 ± 0.31
SMC NS −0.02 ± 0.3 0.07 ± 0.25 −0.06 ± 0.24
NT 0.13 ± 0.22 0.13 ± 0.11 0.1 ± 0.34 0.698 0.448 0.961 0.468 0.001* 0.028# 0.043# 0.000* 0.012*
FT 0.17 ± 0.16 0.14 ± 0.13 0.19 ± 0.28
Overall ROIs 0.018* 0.028*
∆HBB in each ROI (μmol/L)
PFC NS 0.00 ± 0.06 0.04 ± 0.22 0.00 ± 0.12
NT 0.01 ± 0.07 −0.02 ± 0.06 −0.02 ± 0.09 0.625 0.908 0.372 0.456 0.440 0.587 0.201 0.422 0.259
FT −0.01 ± 0.09 −0.03 ± 0.06 0.1 ± 0.3
SMA NS −0.02 ± 0.04 −0.05 ± 0.06 −0.05 ± 0.16
NT −0.02 ± 0.05 −0.05 ± 0.04 −0.08 ± 0.15 0.128 0.147 0.052 0.680 0.468 0.701 0.362 0.224 0.111
FT −0.03 ± 0.08 −0.06 ± 0.03 −0.07 ± 0.17
PMC NS −0.02 ± 0.06 −0.05 ± 0.07 −0.01 ± 0.08
NT −0.02 ± 0.05 −0.03 ± 0.07 −0.02 ± 0.06 0.194 0.403 0.322 0.072 0.897 0.904 0.719 0.648 0.44
FT −0.03 ± 0.06 −0.06 ± 0.07 0.02 ± 0.23
SMC NS −0.04 ± 0.05 −0.09 ± 0.07 −0.04 ± 0.09
NT −0.04 ± 0.05 −0.06 ± 0.07 0.02 ± 0.07 0.006* 0.113 0.087# 0.001* 0.281 0.113 0.433 0.568 0.324
FT −0.05 ± 0.06 −0.09 ± 0.05 −0.03 ± 0.14
Overall ROIs 0.000* 0.337

Group × task effects of multivariate ANOVA test of ∆HBO2 and ∆HBB: p = 0.885 and 0.847, respectively. *p < 0.05 for group and task effects; *p < 0.025 for between-subject (PD-FoG vs. PD-nFoG patients, PD-nFoG patients vs. HCs, and PD-FoG patients vs. HCs) and between-task comparisons (NS vs. NT, NT vs. FT, and NS vs. FT); #p < 0.1, nearly significant. ANOVA, two-way analysis of variance; ∆HBO2, change of oxygenated haemoglobin concentration; ∆HBB, change of deoxygenated haemoglobin concentration; ROI, region of interest; PD-FoG, Parkinson’s disease with freezing of gait; PD-nFoG, Parkinson’s disease without freezing of gait; HC, healthy control; SD, standard deviation; PFC, prefrontal cortex; SMA, supplementary motor area; PMC, premotor-motor cortex; SMC, sensorimotor cortex; NS, normal stepping task; NT, normal turning task; FT, fast turning task.