Skip to main content
PLOS Pathogens logoLink to PLOS Pathogens
. 2023 Mar 10;19(3):e1011214. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1011214

Evolution of highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza A virus in the central nervous system of ferrets

Jurre Y Siegers 1,#, Lucas Ferreri 2,#, Dirk Eggink 3, Edwin J B Veldhuis Kroeze 1, Aartjan J W te Velthuis 4, Marco van de Bildt 1, Lonneke Leijten 1, Peter van Run 1, Dennis de Meulder 1, Theo Bestebroer 1, Mathilde Richard 1, Thijs Kuiken 1, Anice C Lowen 2, Sander Herfst 1, Debby van Riel 1,*
Editor: Sabra L Klein5
PMCID: PMC10032531  PMID: 36897923

Abstract

Central nervous system (CNS) disease is the most common extra-respiratory tract complication of influenza A virus infections in humans. Remarkably, zoonotic highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) H5N1 virus infections are more often associated with CNS disease than infections with seasonal influenza viruses. Evolution of avian influenza viruses has been extensively studied in the context of respiratory infections, but evolutionary processes in CNS infections remain poorly understood. We have previously observed that the ability of HPAI A/Indonesia/5/2005 (H5N1) virus to replicate in and spread throughout the CNS varies widely between individual ferrets. Based on these observations, we sought to understand the impact of entrance into and replication within the CNS on the evolutionary dynamics of virus populations. First, we identified and characterized three substitutions–PB1 E177G and A652T and NP I119M - detected in the CNS of a ferret infected with influenza A/Indonesia/5/2005 (H5N1) virus that developed a severe meningo-encephalitis. We found that some of these substitutions, individually or collectively, resulted in increased polymerase activity in vitro. Nevertheless, in vivo, the virus bearing the CNS-associated mutations retained its capacity to infect the CNS but showed reduced dispersion to other anatomical sites. Analyses of viral diversity in the nasal turbinate and olfactory bulb revealed the lack of a genetic bottleneck acting on virus populations accessing the CNS via this route. Furthermore, virus populations bearing the CNS-associated mutations showed signs of positive selection in the brainstem. These features of dispersion to the CNS are consistent with the action of selective processes, underlining the potential for H5N1 viruses to adapt to the CNS.

Author summary

The central nervous system (CNS) is one of the most common extra-respiratory tract sites of infection for influenza A viruses. In ferrets—an animal model used to study the pathogenesis of influenza—highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 virus can enter the CNS via the olfactory nerve, resulting in the development of a severe meningo-encephalitis. In the present work, we evaluated the evolutionary dynamics of the virus populations entering and spreading throughout the CNS. We show that once inside the CNS, H5N1 viruses can acquire mutations that increase the polymerase activity in vitro. In vivo, the virus bearing these mutations retained its capacity to infect the CNS but showed reduced spread to other anatomical sites. Analysis of virus populations revealed that infection from the nasal turbinate to the olfactory bulb did not present a genetic bottleneck, suggesting a diffusive passage of viruses from the nasal cavity to the CNS. Inside the CNS, specifically in the brainstem, we found signs of positive selection. These findings support the idea that H5N1 viruses can invade the CNS efficiently via the olfactory nerve, and have the potential to adapt to the CNS.

Introduction

Central nervous system (CNS) disease is the most common and potentially fatal extra-respiratory tract complication of influenza A virus infection [1,2]. The ability of influenza viruses to invade and cause disease in the CNS of humans and other mammals varies widely between virus strains [1,2]. However, infections with highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) H5N1 viruses are often associated with spread to extra-respiratory tissues, including the CNS [3]. Intranasal inoculation of ferrets with HPAI H5N1 viruses often results in infection of the olfactory mucosa and subsequent invasion into the CNS, primarily via the olfactory nerve [2, 46] but also via the trigeminal nerve [7]. However, H5N1 virus strains show wide variation in their potential to spread to the CNS [8]. Among individual ferrets infected with the same strain there are also differences in the extent of virus replication and spread throughout the CNS [4,6,9]. The reasons behind this heterogeneity, at both the virus and host levels, are poorly understood.

Once inside the CNS, virus populations encounter cells of neuronal and glial origin that differ phenotypically from cells of the respiratory tract. Viral adaptation to these cells could occur if conditions are conducive to positive selection. A major prerequisite of positive selection is genetic variation. It is therefore relevant to evaluate whether a genetic bottleneck constricts the diversity of viral populations accessing the CNS, which would reduce the potential for adaptation. Whether or not it is subject to a bottleneck, the diversity of the seed population can however be augmented through de novo mutation, resulting from the error-prone replication of the viral genome by the influenza virus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. The potential for positive selection to lead to adaptation is then further reliant on the extent to which selection and drift are active in the virus population [10]. Selection is a deterministic process in which the relative fitness of a variant leads to changes in its frequency: during positive selection, variants increase in frequency owing to a fitness advantage; during purifying selection, variants decrease in frequency and are purged from the population owing to a fitness defect [11]. Beside selection, genetic drift occurs, which is a stochastic process by chance, independent of the fitness [11]. Whether evolution of influenza A viruses in the CNS occurs is currently unknown. Similarly, whether any evolution is driven by positive selection, leading to adaptation to the new environment has not been explored.

In the present study, we evaluated an H5N1 HPAI virus that acquired three substitutions–PB1 E177G and A652T and NP I119M - in the CNS of an experimentally inoculated ferret in order to evaluate the adaptive potential of H5N1 virus to the CNS. This ferret developed a severe meningo-encephalitis associated with virus spread throughout the CNS, including the olfactory bulb, cerebrum, cerebellum, and spinal cord [6]. We performed a phenotypic characterization, in vitro and in vivo, of the virus with the CNS-associated mutations (H5N1-CNS virus) and compared it with the wild type virus (H5N1-WT). We found that the H5N1-CNS virus demonstrated higher polymerase activity than the wild type virus in vitro but did not show increased replication in the CNS in vivo. Analysis of viral variant dynamics within the infected ferrets revealed that viral dissemination into the CNS via the olfactory nerve was not subject to stochastic loss of diversity through genetic bottlenecks. Importantly, the H5N1-CNS virus also showed signs of positive selection in the brainstem, suggesting that H5 HPAI viruses are able to evolve under positive selection within the CNS.

Results

H5N1 virus acquired substitutions PB1-177G, PB1-652T and NP-119M within the ferret CNS

In a prior study, an HPAI H5N1 virus inoculated ferret developed a severe meningoencephalitis with viral replication throughout the CNS. To investigate whether the HPAI H5N1 virus acquired mutations in the CNS, viruses were sequenced from the nasal turbinates, cerebellum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) at 7 days post infection (dpi) and the inoculum [6]. Sequence analyses identified three amino acid substitutions above a frequency of 1% in the viruses from the cerebellum and CSF samples, PB1 E177G and A652T and NP I119M, which were not present in viruses in the inoculum or nasal turbinates [Table 1]. Additionally, one synonymous mutation was observed in the coding region of HA (nucleotide T66C, coding for G22). The fact that PB1 E177G was fixed and that the frequency of PB1 A652T ranged from 0.53 to 0.66 suggests that occurrence of these variants was not co-dependent. Sequencing of the virus inoculum did not reveal the presence of these variants, suggesting that these mutations occurred de novo within the infected ferret.

Table 1. Mutations detected in the CNS of a ferret infected with virus of the H5N1 subtype.

Three substitutions were found in common between the cerebellum (CL) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). REF refers to the nucleotide reference; ALT to the nucleotide alternative variant; REF-AA amino acid reference; ALT-AA to substitution. Sequencing was done using MySeq Illumina platform.

Sample Segment Position REF ALT REF-AA ALT-AA Frequency Coverage
CL PB1 554 A G E G 0.994 5011
CL PB1 1978 G A A T 0.662 4683
CL NP 402 T G I M 0.991 7980
CSF PB1 554 A G E G 0.993 7934
CSF PB1 1978 G A A T 0.534 7930
CSF NP 402 T G I M 0.992 7986

To understand the interactions and possible associations between these mutations, we evaluated their position within the ribonucleoprotein complex [Fig 1]. Structural analysis showed that position 177 in PB1 resides at the base of the β-ribbon domain (residues 177–214) [Fig 1A]. The β-ribbon is a hinged, solvent-exposed domain that contains the two nuclear localization signal (NLS) motifs important for RanBP5 binding and nuclear import of the PA-PB1 heterodimer [12,13]. Furthermore, the flexible β-ribbon has been proposed to play a role in viral RNA binding by contacting the 3’-end of the vRNA when bound to the A-side on the exterior of the polymerase complex [13,14].

Fig 1. Location of PB1 E177G and A652T on the polymerase complex and I119M on the nucleoprotein.

Fig 1

A, overview of the polymerase subdomains with PB1 (light-blue), PB2 (paleyellow), and PA (pale-green) in different orientations and the location of PB1 residue 177 (red). B, location of PB1 residue 652 (red) showing individual atoms within the priming loop (light-blue) on a transparent polymerase background. C, overview of the nucleoprotein subdomains with head (light-blue), tail loop (yellow), linker (pale-orange) and body (pale-green) in different orientations and the location of NP residue 119 (red).

The surface electrostatic potential is important for the affinity and specificity of macromolecular interactions, protein folding, and chemical reactivity. [15] For example, the adaptive E627K mutation in the PB2 subunit of the RNA polymerase changes the surface potential and influences the interaction with host factor ANP32A or importins-α isoforms. [1620]. To investigate whether PB1-E177G could affect a putative interaction with a host or viral binding partner, we evaluated the electrostatic surface potential of the wild-type and CNS mutant PB1 subunit in the unbound (apo) form (S1 Fig) and promotor-bound form of the polymerase [S2 Fig]. In the apo form [S1A and S1B Fig], we observed a change in the surface potential from negative to neutral [S1C and S1D Fig]. In the promotor-bound form [S2A Fig], we observed a shift from moderately negative to moderately positive charge [S2C and S2D Fig]. These results suggest that the PB1-E177G substitution could influence interactions with potential (host) binding factors in both forms of the polymerase.

Residue PB1-652 resides in the priming loop domain, a β-hairpin structure located near the active site of the RNA polymerase [Fig 1B, S3 Fig] [21,22], which has several key functions in influenza virus RNA synthesis [22]. No specific function for residue 652 has been described yet, but analysis of the RNA polymerase structure suggests that substitutions at position PB1-A652T may affect efficient stabilization of the 3’ ssRNA positioning, mediated by residue PB1-651 [22,23] [S3C Fig].

Next, we mapped the location of residue NP-119 using the H5N1 NP X-ray structure [Fig 1C]. Residue NP-119 is located in the body domain and likely not responsible for homodimer formation. Furthermore, superposing the H5N1 NP structure onto the vRNP of A/WSN/33 revealed that residue 119 is likely not involved in any RNA interactions [S4A–S4D Fig]. The relatively large distance of residue 119 with an opposing NP molecule suggests that this residue plays no direct role in NP-NP interactions [S4D Fig]. This is further supported by the electrostatic surface maps showing the large positively charged RNA-biding grove between the head and body domain [S5A–S5D Fig].

CNS-associated mutations enhance polymerase activity in different human cell types

As substitutions were found in the polymerase complex and NP, mediating transcription and replication of the viral genome [24], we investigated the effect of these substitutions on polymerase activity using a minigenome assay in human kidney cells (HEK293T), human lung cells (A549) and human neuronal cells (SH-SY5Y). The mammalian adaptive substitution PB2-E627K, which increases viral polymerase activity, was included as positive control [25,26]. The single substitution PB1-652T resulted in a significant increase of polymerase activity in A549 and SH-SY5Y cells [Fig 2A, S1 Data]. PB1-177G or NP-119M or a combination of NP-119M with PB1-177G or PB1-652T maintained wild-type levels of polymerase activity. The combined substitutions PB1-177G/652T with or without NP-119M significantly improved transcriptional activity in all cell lines, but most prominently in A549 cells [Fig 2A]. Whereas the combination of the three substitutions enhanced polymerase activity in all cell lines, replication of the virus carrying all three substitutions was significantly increased relative to wild type virus only in MDCK cells [Fig 2B, S2 Data].

Fig 2. Polymerase activity of polymerase gene segments carrying PB1 E177G, A652T and NP I119M and in vitro replication kinetics of viruses with these PB1 and NP substituations.

Fig 2

Activity of polymerase complexes carrying PB1 and NP substitutions in HEK-293T, A549, and SH-SY5Y cells (A). Polymerase activity is presented relative to that of H5N1-WT. Dotted lines indicate polymerase activity at H5N1-WT level and 2-fold increased activity. Mutant PB1 or NP genes that have significantly different polymerase or replicative (B) activity from that of H5N1-WT. Signifancies are indicated by asterisks, identified using a one-way (A) analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni’s multiple-comparison tests or a two-way (B) analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Dunnett’s multiple-comparison tests. *, P ≤ 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.01; ***, P ≤ 0.001; ****, P ≤ 0.0001. Data are presented as means ±SEMs for panels A and ±SDs for panels B from at least three independent experiments.

No increased replication of H5N1-CNS virus compared to H5N1-WT in vivo

To evaluate the phenotypes associated with the CNS-associated mutations in vivo, we compared the pathogenesis of H5N1-CNS and H5N1-WT virus in ferrets. Six ferrets were intranasally inoculated with either H5N1-CNS or H5N1-WT virus, followed by euthanasia and tissue sample collection at 3 and 6 dpi. Sneezing was apparent in both groups but no other respiratory signs were observed [Table 2]. Reduced physical activity was observed in both groups and neurological signs were observed in all ferrets except in one ferret from the H5N1-CNS group (Ferret # F11, see Table 3 for ferret numbers).

Table 2. Clinical signs in H5N1-WT and H5N1-CNS virus inoculated ferrets.

H5N1-WT (No./Total) H5N1-CNS (No./Total)
Days post inoculation 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Respiratory signs
 Sneezing - - 6/6 6/6 3/3 - - - - 6/6 6/6 1/3 - -
 Nasal discharge - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
 Dyspnea - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
 Hunched posture - - - - - - - - 1/3 - - - - -
Systemic signs
 Physical condition N/A N/A N/A Good N/A N/A Moderate 1/3 Poor 1/3 Good 1/3 N/A N/A N/A Good N/A N/A Moderate 1/3 Good 2/3
 Activity score* 0 (6/6) 0 (6/6) 0 (6/6) 0 (6/6) 0 (3/3) 1 (3/3) 2 (2/3) 3 (1/3) 0 (6/6) 0 (6/6) 0 (6/6) 0 (6/6) 0 (6/6) 1 (2/3) 0 (1/3) 0 (1/3) 1 (1/3) 2 (1/3)
 Ruffled fur - - - - - - 3/3 - 3/3 - - - - 3/3
Neurological signs
 Ataxia - - - - - - 3/3 - - - - 1/3 - 2/3
 Parases - - - - - - 3/3 - - - - 1/3 - 2/3
 Tremors - - - - - - 1/3 - - - - - - -

*0: Alert and playful

*1: Alert and playful only when stimulated

*2: Alert but not playful when stimulated

*3: Neither alert nor playful when stimulated

N/A: not applicable

Table 3. Virus Antigen Detection in the respiratory tract, central nervous system, and other organs.

3 dpi 6 dpi
H5N1-WT H5N1-CNS H5N1-WT H5N1-CNS
Ferret # F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 F7 F8 F9 F10 F11 F12
Respiratory system
 Nasal Turbinates ++ + ++ ++ + + + ++ ++ + + +
 Soft Palate - - - - - - - - - - - -
 Trachea - - - - - - - - - - - -
 Bronchus - - - - - - - - - - - -
 Lung - - - - - - - - - - - -
 Tonsil + n/a + + n/a - - - - - - -
 Tip of nose +* - - - - - - - - - - -
Central nervous system
 Olfactory bulb - - - + - - ++ + + + + +
 Cerebrum - - - - - - + + + + - +
 Cerebellum - - - - - - ++ + + + - +
 Brainstem - - - - - - + + - + - +
 spinal cord (cervical) n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a + + + + - +
 spinal cord (lumbar) n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a - +* - - - -
 Trigeminal ganglion - - - - - - + + + + - -
Other
 Tongue - + - - - - - + - + - -
 Heart - - - - - - - - - - - -
 Liver - - - - - - - - - - - -
 Spleen - - - - - - - - - - - -
 Kidney - - - - - - - - - - - -
 Adrenal - - - - - - - - - - - -
 Pancreas - - - - - - + - - - - -
 Jejunum - - - - - - - - - - - -
 GALT - - + +* +* - - - - - - -
 Mesenteric LN n/a + + - - - - n/a - n/a - n/a

- negative

+ postive cells

++ abundant positive cells

* sporadic positive cell

n/a not available

Weight loss was observed in all ferrets up to 6 dpi, with the exception of ferret F11 from the H5N1-CNS group, which started to gain weight again after 4 dpi [Fig 3A, S3 Data]. At 1 dpi, weight loss of ferrets infected with H5N1-CNS virus (mean [SD], 5.1% [1.9]) was significantly higher compared to ferrets infected with H5N1-WT virus (3% [0.8]).

Fig 3. In vivo experimental infection of ferrets with of H5N1-CNS or WT-virus.

Fig 3

A, weight loss (% of starting body weight) of ferrets inoculated with H5N1-WT or H5N1-CNS virus. Virus titers in throat (B) and nose (C) swabs. D, virus detection in respiratory tract tissues. NT; nasal turbinates, Tr Br Ln; tracheobronchial lymph node. E, virus detection in different regions of the central nervous system. CSF; cerebrospinal fluid. Data are presented as means ±SDs. Statistical analysis was performed using multiple independent unpaired t-tests. TCID; tissue culture infectious dose, *,p ≤ 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.01; ***, p ≤ 0.001. Dotted lines represent the limit of detection.

We assessed virus shedding from the respiratory tract by measuring viral titers in throat and nasal swabs. In the throat, virus was detected up to day 6, peaking at 2 dpi (mean [SD] of 106.0 [0.3] TCID50/mL for H5N1-WT group and 105.7 [0.8] TCID50/mL for H5N1-CNS group) [Fig 3B, S4 Data]. In the nose, virus was detected from both groups of ferrets up to 6 dpi with peak shedding for H5N1-WT at 2 dpi (102.8 [0.9] TCID50/mL) and for H5N1-CNS at 5 dpi (103.1 [0.8] TCID50/mL). At 1 dpi, viral titers in nose swabs from ferrets inoculated with H5N1-WT virus (103.8 [0.5] TCID50/mL) were significantly higher compared to ferrets inoculated with H5N1-CNS virus (102.1 [0.5] TCID50/mL) [Fig 3C, S4 Data].

Macroscopic examination revealed a moderate-to-poor physical condition in two and one ferret from the H5N1-WT and H5N1-CNS groups, respectively at 6 dpi and good physical condition of all other ferrets at 3 and 6 dpi [Table 2]. In tissues from the respiratory tract, the highest viral titers were detected in the nasal turbinates, with no difference between ferrets inoculated with H5N1-WT or H5N1-CNS virus [Fig 3D, S5 Data]. Viral titers were also detected in the soft palate and tonsil of both groups. Viruses were occasionally detected in the trachea, bronchus, lung and tracheobronchial lymph node of ferrets inoculated with H5N1-WT virus, but not in CNS-virus inoculated ferrets.

In tissues of the CNS, virus was detected in the olfactory bulb from both H5N1-WT and H5N1-CNS virus inoculated ferrets at 3 and 6 dpi with significantly higher titers in the olfactory bulb of H5N1-WT virus inoculated ferrets compared to ferrets inoculated with H5N1-CNS virus [Fig 3E, S5 Data]. No significant differences were observed in the viral titers in the cerebrum, cerebellum, and brainstem between groups. For ferret H5N1-CNS F11, virus could only be detected in the olfactory bulb but not in other parts of the CNS.

We also examined the presence of virus in the heart, liver, spleen, adrenal gland, kidney, pancreas, jejunum, blood, serum and plasma. Virus was sporadically detected in the liver, spleen, adrenal, kidney, pancreas, and jejunum of ferrets inoculated with H5N1-WT, but not in ferrets inoculated with H5N1-CNS [S6 Fig].

Together, these data suggest that H5N1-CNS virus retained the capacity to invade and spread throughout the CNS, although virus titers were lower in the olfactory bulb, lower respiratory tract and extra-respiratory organs compare to ferrets inoculated with H5N1-WT.

Histopathology and distribution of virus antigen in H5N1-CNS and H5N1-WT inoculated ferrets

In the respiratory tract, microscopic examination revealed mild-to-moderate rhinitis and necrosis in the epithelium of the nasal mucosa in all ferrets [Table 3, Fig 4]. In the nasal turbinates, influenza virus antigen was associated with histological lesions and predominantly present in cells of the olfactory mucosa [Fig 4]. In the CNS, virus antigen was detected in the olfactory bulb of one ferret from the H5N1-CNS 3 dpi group [Table 3] without histological lesions. In all ferrets at 6 dpi (except ferret F11), influenza virus antigen was detected in meningeal cells, ependymal cells of ventricles and spinal canal, and neurons in the olfactory bulb, cerebrum, cerebellum and brain stem [Table 3; Fig 4]. Foci of necrosis and inflammation co-localized with virus antigen consistent with an acute mild-to-moderate meningo-encephalitis. Virus antigen was observed in few neuronal cells of the trigeminal ganglia in all ferrets from the H5N1-WT and in one ferret from the H5N1-CNS at 6 dpi [Table 3, Fig 4]. Virus antigen was occasionally detected in lymphoid tissues and/or pancreatic epithelium [Table 3]. A detailed pathological description is available in S1 Data.

Fig 4. Virus infected cells detected by immunohistochemistry in the nasal turbintes at 3 days post inoculation and in the CNS at 6 days post inoculation in H5N1-WT or H5N1-CNS virus inoculated ferrets.

Fig 4

Staining for influenza A virus nucleoprotein is seen as red a red precipitate. Representative bright-field images are shown.

Sequence analysis reveals stability of CNS-associated mutations in vivo

To assess the stability of the CNS-mutations in vivo, and to ensure that the H5N1-WT virus did not acquire mutations at these sites during the experiment, viruses from the respiratory tract and CNS were sequenced using the Illumina platform. The original sequences at the sites of the three CNS-associated mutations were maintained in all ferrets (Tables 4 and 5, S1 and S2 Tables), indicating that the variants examined were stable in vivo.

Table 4. In vivo stability of molecular signatures for CNS-mutations’ sites at 3 dpi.

Gene segment PB1 NP
Amino acid 177 652 119
Reference E A I
Nasal turbinates
 F1, F2, F3 E A I
 F4, F5, F6 G T M
Olfactory bulb
 F1, F2, F3 E A I
 F4, F5, F6 G T M

Table 5. In vivo stability of molecular signatures for CNS-mutations’ sites at 6 dpi.

Gene segment PB1 NP
Amino acid 177 652 119
Reference E A I
Nasal turbinates
 F7, F8, F9 E A I
 F10, F11, F12 G T M
Olfactory bulb
 F7, F8, F9 E A I
 F10, F11, F12 G T M
Cerebrum
 F7, F8, F9 E A I
 F10, F11*, F12 G T M
Cerebellum
 F7, F8, F9 E A I
 F10, F11*, F12 G T M
Brainstem
 F7, F8, F9 E A I
 F10, F11, F12 G T M
CSF
 F7, F8*, F9 E A I
 F10, F11*, F12 G T M

* sequence coverage in viruses was too low and excluded from the analysis.

Viral dissemination from the nasal cavity to the CNS along the olfactory nerve is associated with a loose bottleneck

Entering a new environment can impose genetic bottlenecks on virus populations, reducing genetic diversity. If such contractions are considerable, then stochastic founder effects can occur. To assess if virus transmission to the CNS via the olfactory nerve results in a genetic bottleneck, we compared viral diversity from H5N1-WT-infected ferrets. We performed the analysis on samples that met a cutoff of 1x104 TCID50/g, which included one ferret at 3 dpi and three ferrets at 6 dpi. Contrary to expectation for a stringent bottleneck, we found increased diversity in the olfactory bulb compared to the nasal turbinates in all four animals [Fig 5].

Fig 5. Absence of bottleneck for H5N1-WT virus entering the CNS via the olfactory nerve.

Fig 5

H5N1-WT-virus infected ferrets show higher overall diversity in the olfactory bulb (OB) than in the nasal turbinate (NT).

To gain insight into the processes governing the transfer of viruses between tissues, we compared the variants detected in the nasal turbinate and the olfactory bulb of H5N1-WT-inoculated ferrets at 6 dpi [Fig 6]. While the majority of variants were unique to each tissue, we found that, in the olfactory bulb, 3 in 16, 1 in 10 and 4 in 12 variants were also found in the nasal turbinate from ferret F7, F8 and F9, respectively. These common variants were furthermore found at comparable frequencies in the two tissues. Since it is highly unlikely for common variants at comparable frequencies to arise independently, these data suggest that multiple variants penetrated the CNS from the nasal turbinate. Thus, bottlenecks may not play a role during viral dissemination between these sites. The unique variants identified at each site suggest that, in addition to transfer of multiple variants between the sampled locations, posterior diversification within the olfactory bulb or spread of unsampled populations from the nasal turbinates to this site occurred.

Fig 6. Dispersion of H5N1-WT virus variants from nasal turbinates to the CNS.

Fig 6

Unique variants are presented in grey. Common variants between nasal turbinate (NT) and olfactory bulb (OB) are in orange. Common variants between the olfactory bulb and the brainstem (BS) are in green. Common variants between nasal turbinate and brainstem are in white. Variants that are common throughout are in blue. The types of mutation are represented by shapes: synonymous (Syn.) as circles, nonsynonymous (Nonsyn.) as tringles, variants in the untranslated regions (UTR) as diamonds and nonsense as squares. Nucleotide position within the concatenated viral genome is shown on the x-axis. Dashed grey line shows consensus cut off at frequency of 0.5 whereas the dashed black line marks a frequency of 1.

Dissemination of virus populations through the CNS

To further evaluate population dispersion within the CNS, we evaluated the commonness and uniqueness of variants present in the nasal turbinates, olfactory bulb and brainstem. From the H5N1-WT virus, 2 in 10, 1 in 5 and 2 in 12 variants from the nasal turbinate were found in the brainstem of ferrets F7, F8 and F9, respectively. Variants shared between the olfactory bulb and the brainstem were 4 in 10, 2 in 5 and 1 in 13 for ferrets F7, F8 and F9, respectively [Fig 6]. Analysis of the nasal turbinate and brainstem from ferrets inoculated with the H5N1-CNS virus showed that 2 of 14 were shared for ferret F10, whereas ferret F12 presented only unique variants [S7 Fig]. These results suggest that dissemination of variants through the CNS occurs but that in situ differentiation of viral populations is the primary driver of diversification.

Independent H5N1 virus evolution drives positive selection within the CNS

Virus populations facing new environments or with a fitness defect are subject to fitness increment through positive selection. To evaluate for signs of positive selection at the different anatomical locations, we calculated the ratio πN/πS. Owing to the greater fitness effects of nonsynonymous changes compared to synonymous ones, populations under positive selection typically show ratios above 1.0.

In nasal turbinates collected at 3 dpi, we did not detect signs of positive selection [S8 Fig] for H5N1-WT or H5N1-CNS viruses. However, at 6 dpi, evidence of positive selection acting on the H5N1-CNS virus in nasal turbinates in ferret F11 and brainstem tissues in ferrets F10 and F12 was apparent [Fig 7A]. To evaluate whether the signs of positive selection were the result of the selection of the same variants (parallel evolution) between individual ferrets, we compared the polymorphisms in virus populations present in the brainstem from ferrets F10 and F12 [Fig 7B]. We did not detect common variants between these samples, indicating that the positive selection detected in each animal led to independent paths of evolution.

Fig 7. Signs of positive selection for the H5N1-CNS virus are detected in the nasal turbinate and brainstem tissue of infected ferrets at 6 dpi.

Fig 7

Positive selection was calculated using the πN/πS ratio. Values above 1 denote positive selection (A). Variant analysis suggests independent evolutionary events shown by unique variants in brainstem tissue from ferrets F10 and F12 (B). The types of mutation are represented by shapes: synonymous (Syn.) as circles, nonsynonymous (Nonsyn.) as tringles and variants in the untranslated regions (UTR) as diamonds. The segments are shown as concatenated in the x-axis. Dashed grey line shows consensus cut off at 0.5 of frequency whereas dashed black line marks 1 of frequency.

Discussion

In the present study we aimed to understand the basic mechanisms by which highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 viruses evolve once they infect the mammalian CNS. Using a ferret model, we found that influenza A/Indonesia/5/2005 (H5N1) virus was not subject to bottlenecks when entering the CNS via olfactory bulb, and that once inside the CNS, positive selection of variants can occur. Although the CNS-associated mutations examined did not appear to be adaptive, the viral dynamics observed suggest that an H5N1 virus can increase in fitness once it infects the CNS.

The substitutions PB1 E177G, PB1 A652T and NP I119M in the HPAI H5N1 virus background were found in a ferret with a severe meningo-encephalitis. Further evaluation of these substitutions revealed that they did not enhance virus spread to or viral replication in the CNS. In contrast, they appeared to restrict viral dissemination within infected ferrets, which might be related to a decreased fitness in the respiratory tract. The increased polymerase activity in cell culture and replication in MDCK cells could be associated with the location of PB1 E177G in the beta-ribbon domain, which has previously been implicated in increased polymerase activity in H5N1 viruses, possibly via interactions with host factors [27,28]. Similarly, the location of PB1 A652T suggests it could contribute to efficient stabilization of the 3’ ssRNA positioning by interacting with a downstream base [22,23]. The apparent disconnection between the viral dissemination in vivo and the results from the cell culture-based assays likely relates to the difference in complexity of these systems. The increased in vitro polymerase activity implies that the CNS-associated mutations may have been fixed by positive selection but the fact that, in vivo, PB1 E177G reached fixation first while PB1 A652T seemed to offer greater advantage is possibly the result of the initial fixation of PB1 E177G and posterior selection of PB1 A652T.

Dispersion of virus populations to new anatomical sites can be restricted by physical barriers and/or limited capacity to replicate in the target tissue, which in turn can result in bottlenecks. For H5N1-WT virus, our analysis shows the absence of a bottleneck during virus spread from the nasal cavity to the CNS via the olfactory nerve, suggesting that this transfer occurs without restriction. Viruses can enter the olfactory bulb via the olfactory nerve through at least two mechanisms: i) infection of the olfactory receptor neurons, after which viruses are transported anterograde to the olfactory bulb; or ii) via diffusion through the channel formed by the olfactory ensheathing cells, which form an open connection to the CNS [2]. As H5N1 virus replicates efficiently in the olfactory mucosa it is likely that both mechanisms contribute. In contrast, influenza A viruses that do not replicate abundantly in the olfactory mucosa do not spread efficiently to the CNS via the olfactory nerve, like seasonal H3N2, 1918 pandemic H1N1 or 2009 pandemic H1N1 [7,29].

Even though in situ diversification seemed to be the dominant mechanism by which diversity was generated in viral populations, in H5N1-WT virus infected ferrets, dispersion of minor variants from the nasal turbinates to the CNS was detected at an appreciable frequency. The olfactory bulb received between 10 to 30% of the variants from the nasal turbinates whereas the brainstem received between ~7.5 to ~33%. The latter relationship suggests long range dissemination. Some variants were common across the three tissues, but some others were only shared between two sites. These data suggest that dispersion of some populations may follow the stepping stone model [30], in which populations migrate from the nasal turbinate to the olfactory bulb, diversify and then migrate to the brainstem. However, this mode of dispersion was not clear in all ferrets as the number and species of common variants varied between tissues. These differences can be explained by alternative points of access to the CNS such as the trigeminal ganglia.

In summary, here we show that an HPAI H5N1 virus can enter the CNS via the olfactory nerve without a genetic bottleneck, consistent with the high frequency of CNS involvement in mammals infected with these viruses. Efficient dispersal to the CNS via the olfactory nerve was associated with abundant infection and damage in the olfactory mucosa, which may explain reports of CNS infection by H5N1 viruses in the absence of overt respiratory clinical signs [31,32]. Importantly, we found that viral dynamics within the CNS are conducive to positive selection, giving the potential for improvement of viral replicative capacity, which may translate into more severe disease.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

Research was conducted under a project license from the Dutch competent authority (license number AVD101002015340) and the study protocols were approved by the institutional Animal Welfare Body (Erasmus MC permit number 15-340-17).

Viruses & virus titration

From a previous study in which ferrets were inoculated with HPAI A/Indonesia/5/05 (H5N1) virus (clade 2.1.3.2), a ferret with widespread CNS infection consistent with a severe meningoencephalitis at 7 days post inoculation (dpi) was selected for further characterization [6]. From this ferret, viruses were sequenced from the nasal turbinates, cerebellum, and CSF and recombinant viruses were generated by reverse genetics. In brief, all eight influenza A virus gene segments were amplified by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and cloned in a modified version of the bidirectional reverse genetics plasmid pHW2000 as described before [33,34]. Substitutions of interest (PB1-E177G, PB1-A652T, NP-I119M) were introduced by site-directed mutagenesis using the QuikChange multi-site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene, Leusden, Netherlands) according to the instructions of the manufacturer to generate the H5N1 viruses with single, double or triple mutants. The virus containing all three variants will be referred to as H5N1-CNS virus. Recombinant viruses were produced upon transfection of HEK293T cells as described previously [35]. Virus stocks were propagated once in Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells and the presence of the substitutions of interest were verified using Sanger sequencing as described before [36]. The 50% tissue culture infectious dose (TCID50) in cell supernatant was determined by endpoint titration in MDCK cells, as described before [37]. All in vitro experiments involving HPAI H5N1 viruses were performed under biosafety level 3 conditions.

Cells

Human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells (Sigma-Aldrich,St. Louis, MO, USA) were maintained in a 1:1 mixture of Eagle minimal essential medium with Earle’s Balanced Salt Solution (EMEM EBSS; Lonza, Breda, the Netherlands) and Ham’s F-12 Nutrient Mixture (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Sigma-Aldrich), 100 IU/ml penicillin (Lonza, Basel, Switzerland), 100 μg/ml streptomycin (Lonza), 2 mM glutamine (Lonza), 1.5 mg/ml sodium bicarbonate (Cambrex, Wiesbaden, Germany), sodium pyruvate (ThermoFisher Scientific) and 0.1 mM non-essential amino acids (MP Biomedicals Europe, Illkirch, France). Madin-Darby canine kidney cells (ATCC,Rockville, MD, USA) were maintained in EMEM supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 IU/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin, 2 mM glutamine, 1.5 mg/ml sodium bicarbonate, 1 mM, 10 mM HEPES (Cambrex), and 0.1 mM non-essential amino acids. Human lung epithelial carcinoma A549 cells (ATCC) were maintained in Ham’s F-12 Nutrient Mixture (ThermoFisher), supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 IU/ml penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin. HEK293T cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM; Lonza) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS), 100 IU/ml penicillin, 100 mg/ml streptomycin, 2 mM glutamine, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, and 0.1 mM non-essential amino acids.

Polymerase activity assay

The polymerase acitivity (or minigenome) assay was performed as described previously [38], with the following alterations. The open reading frame of the polymerase basic protein 1 (PB1), polymerase basic protein 2 (PB2), polymerase acidic protein (PA) and nucleoprotein (NP) genes of A/Indonesia/5/2005 (H5N1) were cloned into the pPPI4 expression vectors [39] using Gibson assembly (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA). Mutations in PB1 (E177G and A652T) and NP (I119M) were introduced using QuikChange II Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). HEK-293T, A549, and SH-SY5Y cells were seeded one day prior to the experiment into 96-well plates. Twenty-five ng of the firefly reporter plasmid, 50 ng of each of the plasmids encoding PB2, PB1, and PA, 100 ng of NP and 2 ng of the Renilla luciferase expression plasmid in 50 μl Opti-MEM (Gibco, Thermo Fisher) were mixed with 50 μl Opti-MEM containing Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher) for HEK-293T cells, A549 Cell Avalanche Transfection Reagent (EZ Biosystems, College Park, Maryland, United States) for A459 cells or SK-N-SH Cell Avalanche Transfection Reagent for SH-SY-5Y cells in a 1:3 ratio and incubated for 20 minutes at room temperature. Twenty μl of the transfection mixture was added to each well. Each transfection was performed in quadruplo in at least three independent experiments. Twelve- and 24-hours post transfection, luminescence was measured using the Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System (Promega) using a GloMax luminometer according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Turner BioSystems). H5N1 PB2-627K served as an internal control for a “mammalian adapted” avian influenza virus polymerase complex with increased polymerase activity.

Replication kinetics

Cells (MDCK, SH-SY5Y, and A549) were inoculated at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 0.001. After 1 hour of virus adsorption, cells were washed once and cultured in their respective serum-free medium in the absence of l-1-tosylamide-2-phenylethyl chloromethyl ketone (TPCK)-treated trypsin (Sigma-Aldrich). At 1, 6, 24, and 48 hours post infection (hpi), 100 μl supernatant was collected and stored at −80°C for subsequent virus end-point titration (see “Viruses & virus titration”). All experiments were performed three times independently with two technical replicates from which averages were used for statistical analysis.

Structural modelling

The X-ray crystal structure of the influenza A virus polymerase heterotrimer A/duck/Fujian/01/2002(H5N1) in the RNA-free (apo) and conformation (PDB 6QPF) [23], nucleoprotein of A/WSN/1933 (PDB 2Q06)[40], and vRNP of A/Wilson-Smith/1933 (PDB 4BBL) [41] were used to map the locations of the mutations using the PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 2.3 Schrödinger, LLC.

Animal experiment

Ferrets were housed and experiments were performed in strict compliance with the Dutch legislation for the protection of animals used for scientific purposes (2014, implementing EU Directive 2010/63). Influenza virus and Aleutian Disease Virus seronegative 6-month-old female ferrets (Mustela putorius furo), were obtained from a commercial breeder (TripleF, USA). All animal experiments were performed under biosafety level 3+ conditions. The experiment in which the CNS-associated mutations were found was performed and described previously [6].

In total, twelve ferrets were divided into two groups of six ferrets each: one group inoculated with the H5N1-WT virus and the other group inoculated with the virus containing substitutions found in the CNS (PB1-E177G, PB1-A652T, NP-I119M; H5N1-CNS virus). A description of the ferret numbers and group assignment can be found in Table 3. On day 0, all ferrets were sedated with ketamine and medetomidine (antagonized with atipamezole) and inoculated intranasally with 106 TCID50 of HPAI H5N1-WT or H5N1-CNS virus, divided over both nostrils (50 μL to each nostril), and kept sedated for 10–15 minutes while on their backs, dorsal recumbency. Nasal and throat swabs were collected daily for virological analysis under ketamine sedation. Nasal swab samples were collected from the right nostril to keep the respiratory mucosa of the left nostril intact for pathological examination. Ferrets were weighed daily and observed for clinical signs according to the Reuman activity score [42]. At 3 and 6 days after inoculation, 3 randomly selected ferrets from each group were euthanized by exsanguination after anesthesia with ketamine and medetomidine, and tissues were collected for virological and/or pathological analysis, including nasal turbinates, trachea, lungs, tonsil, adrenal gland, tracheobronchial lymph node, liver, spleen, kidney, heart, pancreas, duodenum, jejunum, olfactory bulb, cerebrum, cerebellum, brainstem, cervical spinal cord, blood, and cerebrospinal fluid.

Pathology and immunohistochemistry

All tissues collected during necropsy were fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin for ≥14 days. Tissues were embedded in paraffin, sectioned at 3 μm, and stained with hematoxylin-eosin for evaluation of histological lesions. For the detection of influenza virus antigen by immunohistochemistry, tissues were stained with a monoclonal antibody against influenza A virus nucleoprotein (clone HB-65; ATCC), as described elsewhere [43].

RNA-seq library preparation and sequencing

RNA-Seq libraries were generated using the KAPA HyperPlus Kit (Roche, 0796248001) and KAPA Unique Dual-Indexed Adapter Kit (Roche, 08861919702), according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Roche, SeqCap EZ HyperCap Workflow, version 2.2). In brief, all 8 gene segments of the influenza virus were amplified using Uni-12’ and Uni-13’ primers [44] specific for the 3’ and 5’ UTR with SuperScript III One-Step RT-PCR System with Platinum Taq High Fidelity DNA Polymerase (Invitrogen, 12574035). Cycling conditions were 55°C for 2 min, 42°C for 60 min, 94°C for 2 min followed by 5 cycles of (94°C for 30s; 44°C for 30 s; 68°C for 3.5 min) and 35 cycles of (94°C for 30 s, 57°C for 30 s; 68°C for 3.5 min) and finally 68°C for 10 min. Viral cDNA was purified using Agencourt AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter, A63880) and subjected to an enzymatic fragmentation step aimed at producing fragments of 300 bp. Following adaptor ligation, libraries were subjected to 7 cycles of PCR to produce libraries ready for sequencing with the following cycling conditions; 45 s 98°C followed by 7 cycles (15 s 98°C, 30 s at 60°C, 30 s at 72°C) and finally 1 min at 72°C. Libraries were pooled in equimolar ratios, and sequencing (11 pM input concentration, spiked with 5% PhiX control V3 was performed using the Illumina Miseq (Miseq Control Software 2.6.2.1). The library pool was diluted and denatured according to the standard Miseq System Denature and Dilute Libraries Guide (Document # 15039740v10), and sequenced to generate paired-end 300 bp reads using a 600 cycle Miseq V3 reagent kit (illumina, MS-102-3003). After sequencing, demultiplexed fastq files were generated on the Miseq and analyzed using CLC Genomics Workbench (Qiagen, version 20) and pipelines developed in house.

Variant analysis

Analysis of non-consensus variants was made using LoFreq [45] following the Genome Analysis Toolkit best practices [46]. After removing adapters using Cutadapt (version 2.8), reads were mapped back to their reference sequence using the option mem from BWA [47]. Data formatting for GATK was made using Picard (http://broadinstitute.github.io/picard/). The use of MarkDuplicates from Picard was avoided as per LoFreq FAQs suggestion (https://csb5.github.io/lofreq/faq/) since samples were PCR products. Reads were realigned using RealignerTargetCreator and IndelRealigner from GATK. The quality of bases was recalculated using BaseRecalibrator from GATK. The resulting bam file was used to perform variant calling analysis by LoFreq. Only variants at a frequency of 0.01 with a coverage equal or above 400 were used. For detection of synonymous and nonsynonymous mutations we used the program SNPdat [48].

Diversity calculation

The π statistic for measuring nucleotide diversity was calculated using the synonymous (πS) and nonsynonymous (πN) nucleotide diversity using SNPGenie [49], which adapts Nei and Gojobori’s (1986) method of estimating synonymous and nonsynonymous substitutions for next-generation sequencing data [50,51]. The cutoff used for calculation of π was set at a variant frequency of 0.01.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 8.2.1 software (La Jolla, CA, USA) for Mac. Each specific test is indicated in the figure legends. P-values of ≤0.05 were considered significant. All data are presented as means ± standard deviations (SD) or stand error of mean (SEM) indicated in the figure legend from at least three independent experiments.

Plots

Some figures were made using the RStudio and the package ggplot2 [52] and aesthetically modified using Inkscape v0.48.1 (https://inkscape.org).

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Electrostatic surface potential of the polymerase and in proximity of PB1 residue 177 in apo-conformation.

Overview of the electrostatic surface potential of the polymerase complex (A) with closeup view of the PB1 at residue 177 with a glutamic acid (B) and glycine (C). Colors indicate a negative potential (red) and positive potential (blue) according to the color-coded electrostatic surface (unit KT/e).

(TIF)

S2 Fig

Electrostatic surface potential of the polymerase and in proximity of PB1 residue 177 with bound vRNA promotor (A). Overview of the electrostatic surface potential of the polymerase complex (B) with closeup view of the PB1 at residue 177 with a glutamic acid (C) and glycine (D). Colors indicate a negative potential (red) and positive potential (blue) according to the color scale bar.

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Location of residue 652 in the priming loop of PB1.

(A), overview of the polymerase subdomains with PB1 (light-blue), PB2 (pale-yellow), and PA (pale-green), 5’ RNA template, 3’ RNA template, and mRNA product. (B), location of PB1 residue 651 (blue) and 652 (red) within the priming loop (light-blue). (C), location of PB1 residue 651 (blue) in contact (yellow dotted line) with the 3’ RNA template.

(TIF)

S4 Fig. Location of residue 119 in nucleoprotein.

(A), overview of the vRNP complex with NP (grey), RNA (black) and residue 119 (red). (B), the H5N1 NP (light-blue) superimposed on WSN NP (grey) with residue 119 (red) and RNA (black). (C), same as B, alternate view with closeup view displaying NP-interactions on opposite strands.

(TIF)

S5 Fig. Electrostatic surface potential of the nucleoprotein and in proximity of residue 119.

Overview of the electrostatic surface potential of the polymerase complex (B) with closeup view (C & D) of the NP at residue 119 with an isoleucine (I) and methionine (M). Colors indicate a negative potential (red) and positive potential (blue) according to the color scale bar.

(TIF)

S6 Fig. Virus detection in other organs of ferrets infected with H5N1-WT or H5N1-CNS virus, 3 and 6 dpi.

Dots represent individual ferrets while bars and lines represent means ±SDs respectively. Statistical analysis was performed using multiple independent unpaired t-tests. TCID; tissue culture infectious dose. Dotted lines represent the limit of detection.

(TIF)

S7 Fig. Dispersion from nasal turbinates to the CNS in H5N1-CNS-infected ferrets.

Only samples from ferret that met cutoff are shown. Unique variants are presented in grey and common variants in blue. The types of mutation are represented by shapes: synonymous (Syn.) as circles, nonsynonymous (Nonsyn.) as tringles, variants in the untranslated regions (UTR) as diamonds and nonsense as squares. Nucleotide position within the concatenated viral genome is shown on the x-axis. Dashed grey line shows consensus cut off at frequency of 0.5 whereas the dashed black line marks a frequency of 1.

(TIFF)

S8 Fig. Absence of positive selection in nasal turbinate at 3 dpi.

Bars and values above denote πN/πS ratio.

(TIFF)

S1 Table. In vivo stability of molecular signatures for CNS-mutations’ sites at 3 dpi and alternative consensus alleles.

(DOCX)

S2 Table. In vivo stability of molecular signatures for CNS-mutations’ sites at 6 dpi and alternative consensus alleles.

(DOCX)

S1 Data. Raw data mini genome assay.

(XLSX)

S2 Data. Raw data virus titration / growth kinetics.

(XLSX)

S3 Data. Raw data weight loss.

(XLSX)

S4 Data. Raw data viruses titration throat and nose swabs.

(XLSX)

S5 Data. Raw data virus titration organs.

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Prof. Ron Fouchier & Prof. Thijs Kuiken for the useful discussions.

Data Availability

The sequences are available through NCBI’s Short Read Archive (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/?term=PRJNA911281) BioProject accession number PRJNA911281. All custom computer code necessary to reproduce the results presented in the manuscript are available on GitHub (https://github.com/genferreri/Evolution-of-highly-pathogenic-H5N1-influenza-A-virus-in-the-central-nervous-system-of-ferrets].

Funding Statement

DvR is supported by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (VIDI 91718308) and an EUR fellowship. This work was funded in part by R01 AI154894 to ACL and NIH/NIAID contract HHSN272201400008C to MR and SH. AtV is supported by NIH/NIAID (grants DP2 AI175474-01 and R01 AI170520), and Wellcome Trust (grant 206579/Z/17/Z). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Sellers SA, Hagan RS, Hayden FG, Fischer WA 2nd. The hidden burden of influenza: A review of the extra-pulmonary complications of influenza infection. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2017;11(5):372–93. Epub 2017/07/27. doi: 10.1111/irv.12470 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.van Riel D, Verdijk R, Kuiken T. The olfactory nerve: a shortcut for influenza and other viral diseases into the central nervous system. J Pathol. 2015;235(2):277–87. Epub 2014/10/09. doi: 10.1002/path.4461 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kuiken T, Taubenberger JK. Pathology of human influenza revisited. Vaccine. 2008;26 Suppl 4:D59–66. Epub 2009/02/21. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.07.025 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Schrauwen EJ, Herfst S, Leijten LM, van Run P, Bestebroer TM, Linster M, et al. The multibasic cleavage site in H5N1 virus is critical for systemic spread along the olfactory and hematogenous routes in ferrets. J Virol. 2012;86(7):3975–84. Epub 2012/01/27. doi: 10.1128/JVI.06828-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Shinya K, Shimada A, Ito T, Otsuki K, Morita T, Tanaka H, et al. Avian influenza virus intranasally inoculated infects the central nervous system of mice through the general visceral afferent nerve. Arch Virol. 2000;145(1):187–95. Epub 2000/02/09. doi: 10.1007/s007050050016 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Siegers JY, van den Brand JM, Leijten LM, van de Bildt MM, van Run PR, van Amerongen G, et al. Vaccination Is More Effective Than Prophylactic Oseltamivir in Preventing CNS Invasion by H5N1 Virus via the Olfactory Nerve. J Infect Dis. 2016;214(4):516–24. Epub 2016/07/23. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiw123 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.de Wit E, Siegers JY, Cronin JM, Weatherman S, van den Brand JM, Leijten LM, et al. 1918 H1N1 Influenza Virus Replicates and Induces Proinflammatory Cytokine Responses in Extrarespiratory Tissues of Ferrets. J Infect Dis. 2018;217(8):1237–46. Epub 2018/01/13. 4796831 doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiy003 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Shinya K, Makino A, Hatta M, Watanabe S, Kim JH, Hatta Y, et al. Subclinical brain injury caused by H5N1 influenza virus infection. J Virol. 2011;85(10):5202–7. Epub 2011/03/11. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00239-11 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bodewes R, Kreijtz JH, van Amerongen G, Fouchier RA, Osterhaus AD, Rimmelzwaan GF, et al. Pathogenesis of Influenza A/H5N1 virus infection in ferrets differs between intranasal and intratracheal routes of inoculation. Am J Pathol. 2011;179(1):30–6. Epub 2011/06/07. S0002-9440(11)00350-6 doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.03.026 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Moya A, Holmes EC, Gonzalez-Candelas F. The population genetics and evolutionary epidemiology of RNA viruses. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004;2(4):279–88. Epub 2004/03/20. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro863 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rouzine IM, Rodrigo A, Coffin JM. Transition between stochastic evolution and deterministic evolution in the presence of selection: general theory and application to virology. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2001;65(1):151–85. Epub 2001/03/10. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.65.1.151-185.2001 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hutchinson EC, Orr OE, Man Liu S, Engelhardt OG, Fodor E. Characterization of the interaction between the influenza A virus polymerase subunit PB1 and the host nuclear import factor Ran-binding protein 5. J Gen Virol. 2011;92(Pt 8):1859–69. Epub 2011/05/13. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.032813-0 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Pflug A, Guilligay D, Reich S, Cusack S. Structure of influenza A polymerase bound to the viral RNA promoter. Nature. 2014;516(7531):355–60. Epub 2014/11/20. doi: 10.1038/nature14008 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Reich S, Guilligay D, Pflug A, Malet H, Berger I, Crepin T, et al. Structural insight into cap-snatching and RNA synthesis by influenza polymerase. Nature. 2014;516(7531):361–6. Epub 2014/11/20. doi: 10.1038/nature14009 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Righetto I, Filippini F. Pandemic Avian Influenza and Intra/Interhaemagglutinin Subtype Electrostatic Variation among Viruses Isolated from Avian, Mammalian, and Human Hosts. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:3870508. Epub 2018/06/12. doi: 10.1155/2018/3870508 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chin AWH, Leong NKC, Nicholls JM, Poon LLM. Characterization of influenza A viruses with polymorphism in PB2 residues 701 and 702. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):11361. Epub 2017/09/14. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-11625-y . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Camacho-Zarco AR, Kalayil S, Maurin D, Salvi N, Delaforge E, Milles S, et al. Molecular basis of host-adaptation interactions between influenza virus polymerase PB2 subunit and ANP32A. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):3656. Epub 2020/07/23. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17407-x . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Carrique L, Fan H, Walker AP, Keown JR, Sharps J, Staller E, et al. Host ANP32A mediates the assembly of the influenza virus replicase. Nature. 2020;587(7835):638–43. Epub 2020/11/20. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2927-z . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tarendeau F, Crepin T, Guilligay D, Ruigrok RW, Cusack S, Hart DJ. Host determinant residue lysine 627 lies on the surface of a discrete, folded domain of influenza virus polymerase PB2 subunit. PLoS Pathog. 2008;4(8):e1000136. Epub 2008/09/05. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000136 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kuzuhara T, Kise D, Yoshida H, Horita T, Murazaki Y, Nishimura A, et al. Structural basis of the influenza A virus RNA polymerase PB2 RNA-binding domain containing the pathogenicity-determinant lysine 627 residue. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(11):6855–60. Epub 2009/01/16. S0021-9258(20)32568-0 doi: 10.1074/jbc.C800224200 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Oymans J, Te Velthuis AJW. A Mechanism for Priming and Realignment during Influenza A Virus Replication. J Virol. 2018;92(3). Epub 2017/11/10. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01773-17 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Te Velthuis AJ, Robb NC, Kapanidis AN, Fodor E. The role of the priming loop in Influenza A virus RNA synthesis. Nat Microbiol. 2016;1(5). Epub 2016/06/09. doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.29 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Fan H, Walker AP, Carrique L, Keown JR, Serna Martin I, Karia D, et al. Structures of influenza A virus RNA polymerase offer insight into viral genome replication. Nature. 2019;573(7773):287–90. Epub 2019/09/06. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1530-7 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Te Velthuis AJ, Fodor E. Influenza virus RNA polymerase: insights into the mechanisms of viral RNA synthesis. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2016;14(8):479–93. Epub 2016/07/12. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.87 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Gabriel G, Dauber B, Wolff T, Planz O, Klenk HD, Stech J. The viral polymerase mediates adaptation of an avian influenza virus to a mammalian host. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(51):18590–5. Epub 2005/12/13. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0507415102 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Subbarao K, Klimov A, Katz J, Regnery H, Lim W, Hall H, et al. Characterization of an avian influenza A (H5N1) virus isolated from a child with a fatal respiratory illness. Science. 1998;279(5349):393–6. Epub 1998/02/07. doi: 10.1126/science.279.5349.393 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Arai Y, Kawashita N, Daidoji T, Ibrahim MS, El-Gendy EM, Takagi T, et al. Novel Polymerase Gene Mutations for Human Adaptation in Clinical Isolates of Avian H5N1 Influenza Viruses. PLoS Pathog. 2016;12(4):e1005583. Epub 2016/04/21. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005583 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Maines TR, Chen LM, Belser JA, Van Hoeven N, Smith E, Donis RO, et al. Multiple genes contribute to the virulent phenotype observed in ferrets of an H5N1 influenza virus isolated from Thailand in 2004. Virology. 2011;413(2):226–30. Epub 2011/03/11. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2011.02.005 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.van den Brand JM, Stittelaar KJ, van Amerongen G, Reperant L, de Waal L, Osterhaus AD, et al. Comparison of temporal and spatial dynamics of seasonal H3N2, pandemic H1N1 and highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 virus infections in ferrets. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e42343. Epub 2012/08/21. [pii]. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042343 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Kimura M, Weiss GH. The Stepping Stone Model of Population Structure and the Decrease of Genetic Correlation with Distance. Genetics. 1964;49(4):561–76. Epub 1964/04/01. doi: 10.1093/genetics/49.4.561 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Simon M, Hernu R, Cour M, Casalegno JS, Lina B, Argaud L. Fatal influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 encephalopathy in immunocompetent man. Emerg Infect Dis. 2013;19(6):1005–7. Epub 2013/06/06. doi: 10.3201/eid1906.130062 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.de Jong MD, Bach VC, Phan TQ, Vo MH, Tran TT, Nguyen BH, et al. Fatal avian influenza A (H5N1) in a child presenting with diarrhea followed by coma. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(7):686–91. Epub 2005/02/18. 352/7/686 doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa044307 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Chutinimitkul S, Herfst S, Steel J, Lowen AC, Ye J, van Riel D, et al. Virulence-associated substitution D222G in the hemagglutinin of 2009 pandemic influenza A(H1N1) virus affects receptor binding. J Virol. 2010;84(22):11802–13. Epub 2010/09/17. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01136-10 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.de Wit E, Spronken MI, Bestebroer TM, Rimmelzwaan GF, Osterhaus AD, Fouchier RA. Efficient generation and growth of influenza virus A/PR/8/34 from eight cDNA fragments. Virus Res. 2004;103(1–2):155–61. Epub 2004/05/28. [pii]. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2004.02.028 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.de Wit E, Spronken MIJ, Vervaet G, Rimmelzwaan GF, Osterhaus A, Fouchier RAM. A reverse-genetics system for Influenza A virus using T7 RNA polymerase. J Gen Virol. 2007;88(Pt 4):1281–7. Epub 2007/03/22. doi: 10.1099/vir.0.82452-0 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Herfst S, Schrauwen EJ, Linster M, Chutinimitkul S, de Wit E, Munster VJ, et al. Airborne transmission of influenza A/H5N1 virus between ferrets. Science. 2012;336(6088):1534–41. Epub 2012/06/23. 336/6088/1534 doi: 10.1126/science.1213362 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Siegers JY, van de Bildt MWG, Lin Z, Leijten LM, Lavrijssen RAM, Bestebroer T, et al. Viral Factors Important for Efficient Replication of Influenza A Viruses in Cells of the Central Nervous System. J Virol. 2019;93(11). Epub 2019/03/15. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02273-18 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Vigeveno RM, Poen MJ, Parker E, Holwerda M, de Haan K, van Montfort T, et al. Outbreak Severity of Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza A(H5N8) Viruses Is Inversely Correlated to Polymerase Complex Activity and Interferon Induction. J Virol. 2020;94(11). Epub 2020/04/03. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00375-20 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Binley JM, Sanders RW, Clas B, Schuelke N, Master A, Guo Y, et al. A recombinant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope glycoprotein complex stabilized by an intermolecular disulfide bond between the gp120 and gp41 subunits is an antigenic mimic of the trimeric virion-associated structure. J Virol. 2000;74(2):627–43. doi: 10.1128/jvi.74.2.627-643.2000 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ng AK, Zhang H, Tan K, Li Z, Liu JH, Chan PK, et al. Structure of the influenza virus A H5N1 nucleoprotein: implications for RNA binding, oligomerization, and vaccine design. FASEB J. 2008;22(10):3638–47. Epub 2008/07/11. doi: 10.1096/fj.08-112110 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Arranz R, Coloma R, Chichon FJ, Conesa JJ, Carrascosa JL, Valpuesta JM, et al. The structure of native influenza virion ribonucleoproteins. Science. 2012;338(6114):1634–7. Epub 2012/11/28. doi: 10.1126/science.1228172 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Reuman PD, Keely S, Schiff GM. Assessment of signs of influenza illness in the ferret model. J Virol Methods. 1989;24(1–2):27–34. Epub 1989/04/01. doi: 10.1016/0166-0934(89)90004-9 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.van Riel D, Rimmelzwaan GF, van Amerongen G, Osterhaus AD, Kuiken T. Highly pathogenic avian influenza virus H7N7 isolated from a fatal human case causes respiratory disease in cats but does not spread systemically. Am J Pathol. 2010;177(5):2185–90. Epub 2010/09/18. S0002-9440(10)60272-6 doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.100401 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Zhou B, Donnelly ME, Scholes DT, St George K, Hatta M, Kawaoka Y, et al. Single-reaction genomic amplification accelerates sequencing and vaccine production for classical and Swine origin human influenza a viruses. J Virol. 2009;83(19):10309–13. Epub 2009/07/17. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01109-09 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Wilm A, Aw PP, Bertrand D, Yeo GH, Ong SH, Wong CH, et al. LoFreq: a sequence-quality aware, ultra-sensitive variant caller for uncovering cell-population heterogeneity from high-throughput sequencing datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40(22):11189–201. Epub 20121012. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks918 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Van der Auwera GA, Carneiro MO, Hartl C, Poplin R, Del Angel G, Levy-Moonshine A, et al. From FastQ data to high confidence variant calls: the Genome Analysis Toolkit best practices pipeline. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics. 2013;43:11 0 1–33. Epub 2014/11/29. doi: 10.1002/0471250953.bi1110s43 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(14):1754–60. Epub 2009/05/20. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Doran AG, Creevey CJ. Snpdat: easy and rapid annotation of results from de novo snp discovery projects for model and non-model organisms. BMC Bioinformatics. 2013;14:45. Epub 2013/02/09. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-45 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Nelson CW, Moncla LH, Hughes AL. SNPGenie: estimating evolutionary parameters to detect natural selection using pooled next-generation sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2015;31(22):3709–11. Epub 2015/08/01. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv449 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Nei M, Gojobori T. Simple methods for estimating the numbers of synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitutions. Mol Biol Evol. 1986;3(5):418–26. Epub 1986/09/01. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040410 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Wilker PR, Dinis JM, Starrett G, Imai M, Hatta M, Nelson CW, et al. Selection on haemagglutinin imposes a bottleneck during mammalian transmission of reassortant H5N1 influenza viruses. Nat Commun. 2013;4:2636. Epub 2013/10/24. doi: 10.1038/ncomms3636 . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Wickham H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer-Verlag. 2016. [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Sabra L Klein, Ana Fernandez-Sesma

27 Oct 2022

Dear Dr van Riel,

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "Evolution of highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza A virus in the central nervous system of ferrets" for consideration at PLOS Pathogens. As with all papers reviewed by the journal, your manuscript was reviewed by members of the editorial board and by several independent reviewers. In light of the reviews (below this email), we would like to invite the resubmission of a significantly-revised version that takes into account the reviewers' comments.

The concerns raised by Reviewer 2, in particular, should be carefully considered including how to address the concern that the CNS-associated virus mutations do not cause the same phenotype in ferrets. The biological relevance of the virus mutations must be addressed.

We cannot make any decision about publication until we have seen the revised manuscript and your response to the reviewers' comments. Your revised manuscript is also likely to be sent to reviewers for further evaluation.

When you are ready to resubmit, please upload the following:

[1] A letter containing a detailed list of your responses to the review comments and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript. Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out.

[2] Two versions of the revised manuscript: one with either highlights or tracked changes denoting where the text has been changed; the other a clean version (uploaded as the manuscript file).

Important additional instructions are given below your reviewer comments.

Please prepare and submit your revised manuscript within 60 days. If you anticipate any delay, please let us know the expected resubmission date by replying to this email. Please note that revised manuscripts received after the 60-day due date may require evaluation and peer review similar to newly submitted manuscripts.

Thank you again for your submission. We hope that our editorial process has been constructive so far, and we welcome your feedback at any time. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

Sabra L. Klein

Associate Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Ana Fernandez-Sesma

Section Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Kasturi Haldar

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-158X

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

***********************

The concerns raised by Reviewer 2, in particular, should be carefully considered including how to address the concern that the CNS-associated virus mutations do not cause the same phenotype in ferrets. The biological relevance of the virus mutations must be addressed.

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Part I - Summary

Please use this section to discuss strengths/weaknesses of study, novelty/significance, general execution and scholarship.

Reviewer #1: Siegers et al have performed detailed experiments to explore the mechanisms by which the HPAI H5N1 virus evolves in the mammalian CNS. The authors demonstrate that an HPAI H5N1 virus can enter the CNS via the olfactory nerve without a genetic bottleneck. And the authors conclude that viral dynamics within the CNS are conducive to positive selection, which gives the potential for improvement of viral replicative capacity and may lead to more severe disease.

Reviewer #2: Professor van Riel and colleagues report findings from in vitro and in vivo studies that examined the contribution of specific amino acid residues of an H5N1 influenza A virus strain to CNS invasion and neurological disease. Cell culture studies revealed that the CNS-associated mutations enhanced the in vitro viral replication phenotype. Follow-up analysis with the ferret model of influenza and an H5N1 influenza virus strain harboring these putative CNS-associated mutations revealed an attenuated viral phenotype, including restricted tissue distribution. The results suggest the consequence of positive selection on viral phenotypes and potential evolution of influenza viruses.

**********

Part II – Major Issues: Key Experiments Required for Acceptance

Please use this section to detail the key new experiments or modifications of existing experiments that should be absolutely required to validate study conclusions.

Generally, there should be no more than 3 such required experiments or major modifications for a "Major Revision" recommendation. If more than 3 experiments are necessary to validate the study conclusions, then you are encouraged to recommend "Reject".

Reviewer #1: 1.Lines 104-111. Please explain why the change in the surface potential from negative to neutral in the apo form and from moderately negative to moderately positive charge in the promotor-bound form influence interactions with potential (host) binging factors?

2. Lines 133-137. Both the single substitution PB1-652T and the combined substitutions PB1-652T/177G with NP-119M can result in a significant increase of polymerase activity in A549 cells. However, the combination of PB1-652T with NP-119M maintained wild-type levels of polymerase activity. Please give some reasonable explanation for these phenotypes that seem contradictory.

Reviewer #2: Genetic analysis of the viral population within the nasal cavity did not reveal a potential bottleneck or selection of virus with CNS-associated mutations. These results suggest the possibility that viral quasispecies contribute to the observed CNS invasive phenotype, neurological disease, and broad tissue distribution, which was lost by selection of a specific viral strain with the CNS-associated mutations. Another limitation of the study is that this phenotype was observed for one infected ferret. It is unclear how the host-specific response of this one animal contributed to the observed phenotype and if the selective forces are reproducible in shaping evolution of influenza viruses.

**********

Part III – Minor Issues: Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications

Please use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity.

Reviewer #1: 1.It is better to specify which amino acids were site-directed mutated to generate the H5N1-CNS virus in Materials and methods or anywhere proper.

2.Line 125. Where are the large positively charged RNA-biding grove? Please highlight it in the supplementary figure 5.

3. Line 127. “different ‘human’ cell types” is suggested for more specific description.

4.Fig 5. Whether the difference of genetic diversity is significant statistically?

Line 205.

5.Line 205. The study aimed to explore the CNS-associated mutations of an H5N1 HPAIV, did not involve reassortment events among different viruses, so “variant” may be appropriate than “genotypes”.

6.Lines 222, 223. Please provide more information to explain what the sentence “it is highly unlikely for common variants penetrated the CNS from the nasal turbinate” .

7.Line 278. what’s means of “stochastic fixation”?

8. Statistical method in Fig. 2. Whether one-way ANOVA should be used instead of two-way ANOVA?

Reviewer #2: not-applicable

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Honglei Sun

Reviewer #2: No

Figure Files:

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

Data Requirements:

Please note that, as a condition of publication, PLOS' data policy requires that you make available all data used to draw the conclusions outlined in your manuscript. Data must be deposited in an appropriate repository, included within the body of the manuscript, or uploaded as supporting information. This includes all numerical values that were used to generate graphs, histograms etc.. For an example see here on PLOS Biology: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5.

Reproducibility:

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option to publish peer-reviewed clinical study protocols. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols

Decision Letter 1

Sabra L Klein, Ana Fernandez-Sesma

16 Feb 2023

Dear Dr van Riel,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'Evolution of highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza A virus in the central nervous system of ferrets' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Pathogens.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, you will automatically be opted out of early publication. We ask that you notify us now if you or your institution is planning to press release the article. All press must be co-ordinated with PLOS.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Pathogens.

Best regards,

Sabra L. Klein

Academic Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Ana Fernandez-Sesma

Section Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Kasturi Haldar

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-158X

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

***********************************************************

Reviewer Comments (if any, and for reference):

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Part I - Summary

Please use this section to discuss strengths/weaknesses of study, novelty/significance, general execution and scholarship.

Reviewer #1: The manuscript modification meets the requirement.

Reviewer #2: This in vivo study examined the replication phenotype and tissue distribution of H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza virus in the ferret model of influenza. The authors note that the findings are limited to one animal but the data indicate the impact of genetic evolution for virus replication and viral pathogenesis. Overall, the authors deserve high marks for execution and scholarship.

**********

Part II – Major Issues: Key Experiments Required for Acceptance

Please use this section to detail the key new experiments or modifications of existing experiments that should be absolutely required to validate study conclusions.

Generally, there should be no more than 3 such required experiments or major modifications for a "Major Revision" recommendation. If more than 3 experiments are necessary to validate the study conclusions, then you are encouraged to recommend "Reject".

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Not applicable.

**********

Part III – Minor Issues: Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications

Please use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Not applicable.

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Acceptance letter

Sabra L Klein, Ana Fernandez-Sesma

3 Mar 2023

Dear Dr van Riel,

We are delighted to inform you that your manuscript, "Evolution of highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza A virus in the central nervous system of ferrets," has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Pathogens.

We have now passed your article onto the PLOS Production Department who will complete the rest of the pre-publication process. All authors will receive a confirmation email upon publication.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any scientific or type-setting errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript. Note: Proofs for Front Matter articles (Pearls, Reviews, Opinions, etc...) are generated on a different schedule and may not be made available as quickly.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, the early version of your manuscript, if you opted to have an early version of your article, will be published online. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Pathogens.

Best regards,

Kasturi Haldar

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-158X

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Electrostatic surface potential of the polymerase and in proximity of PB1 residue 177 in apo-conformation.

    Overview of the electrostatic surface potential of the polymerase complex (A) with closeup view of the PB1 at residue 177 with a glutamic acid (B) and glycine (C). Colors indicate a negative potential (red) and positive potential (blue) according to the color-coded electrostatic surface (unit KT/e).

    (TIF)

    S2 Fig

    Electrostatic surface potential of the polymerase and in proximity of PB1 residue 177 with bound vRNA promotor (A). Overview of the electrostatic surface potential of the polymerase complex (B) with closeup view of the PB1 at residue 177 with a glutamic acid (C) and glycine (D). Colors indicate a negative potential (red) and positive potential (blue) according to the color scale bar.

    (TIF)

    S3 Fig. Location of residue 652 in the priming loop of PB1.

    (A), overview of the polymerase subdomains with PB1 (light-blue), PB2 (pale-yellow), and PA (pale-green), 5’ RNA template, 3’ RNA template, and mRNA product. (B), location of PB1 residue 651 (blue) and 652 (red) within the priming loop (light-blue). (C), location of PB1 residue 651 (blue) in contact (yellow dotted line) with the 3’ RNA template.

    (TIF)

    S4 Fig. Location of residue 119 in nucleoprotein.

    (A), overview of the vRNP complex with NP (grey), RNA (black) and residue 119 (red). (B), the H5N1 NP (light-blue) superimposed on WSN NP (grey) with residue 119 (red) and RNA (black). (C), same as B, alternate view with closeup view displaying NP-interactions on opposite strands.

    (TIF)

    S5 Fig. Electrostatic surface potential of the nucleoprotein and in proximity of residue 119.

    Overview of the electrostatic surface potential of the polymerase complex (B) with closeup view (C & D) of the NP at residue 119 with an isoleucine (I) and methionine (M). Colors indicate a negative potential (red) and positive potential (blue) according to the color scale bar.

    (TIF)

    S6 Fig. Virus detection in other organs of ferrets infected with H5N1-WT or H5N1-CNS virus, 3 and 6 dpi.

    Dots represent individual ferrets while bars and lines represent means ±SDs respectively. Statistical analysis was performed using multiple independent unpaired t-tests. TCID; tissue culture infectious dose. Dotted lines represent the limit of detection.

    (TIF)

    S7 Fig. Dispersion from nasal turbinates to the CNS in H5N1-CNS-infected ferrets.

    Only samples from ferret that met cutoff are shown. Unique variants are presented in grey and common variants in blue. The types of mutation are represented by shapes: synonymous (Syn.) as circles, nonsynonymous (Nonsyn.) as tringles, variants in the untranslated regions (UTR) as diamonds and nonsense as squares. Nucleotide position within the concatenated viral genome is shown on the x-axis. Dashed grey line shows consensus cut off at frequency of 0.5 whereas the dashed black line marks a frequency of 1.

    (TIFF)

    S8 Fig. Absence of positive selection in nasal turbinate at 3 dpi.

    Bars and values above denote πN/πS ratio.

    (TIFF)

    S1 Table. In vivo stability of molecular signatures for CNS-mutations’ sites at 3 dpi and alternative consensus alleles.

    (DOCX)

    S2 Table. In vivo stability of molecular signatures for CNS-mutations’ sites at 6 dpi and alternative consensus alleles.

    (DOCX)

    S1 Data. Raw data mini genome assay.

    (XLSX)

    S2 Data. Raw data virus titration / growth kinetics.

    (XLSX)

    S3 Data. Raw data weight loss.

    (XLSX)

    S4 Data. Raw data viruses titration throat and nose swabs.

    (XLSX)

    S5 Data. Raw data virus titration organs.

    (XLSX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Rebuttal letter.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    The sequences are available through NCBI’s Short Read Archive (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/?term=PRJNA911281) BioProject accession number PRJNA911281. All custom computer code necessary to reproduce the results presented in the manuscript are available on GitHub (https://github.com/genferreri/Evolution-of-highly-pathogenic-H5N1-influenza-A-virus-in-the-central-nervous-system-of-ferrets].


    Articles from PLOS Pathogens are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES