Exhibit 4.
Relative increase for Title X clinics compared to non-Title X clinics | 95% confidence interval (lower bound, upper bound) | |
---|---|---|
Most effective | ||
Overall | 1.52 | (1.23, 1.88) |
Adolescents (15–19 years) | 1.58 | (1.24, 2.02) |
Young Adults (20–24 years) | 1.26 | (0.98, 1.61) |
Adults (25–49 years) | 1.46 | (1.17, 1.83) |
Moderately effective | ||
Overall | 1.49 | (1.29, 1.73) |
Adolescents (15–19 years) | 1.35 | (1.11, 1.62) |
Young Adults (20–24 years) | 1.34 | (1.13, 1.58) |
Adults (25–49 years) | 1.61 | (1.33, 1.94) |
SOURCE: Study-generated data.
NOTE: Most effective contraceptives: intrauterine devices or contraceptive implants. Moderately effective contraceptives: oral pill, patch, contraceptive injection, vaginal ring.
Adjusted means estimate (relative rate) of prevalence of contraception provision by Title X clinics vs non-Title X clinics, averaged across the entire study period, from a total of 4,608 clinic-quarters, 2016–2018. Estimates obtained from Poisson regression model with log link and autoregressive correlation structure with robust variance estimator; relative rate estimates from LSM estimate contrast statement of quarter*Title X interaction.