Table 3:

Survey responses of participants

Survey Response	Mentors n= 23 n(%)	Mentees n= 19 n(%)	p-value
Met with mentor/mentee	21 (91)	13 (68)	0.53
Met at least every 6 months	8 (34)	7 (37)	0.92
Optimal meeting frequency, at least every 6 months	19 (83)	13 (68)	0.69
Mentor/mentee adequately prepared	19 (83)	10 (53)	0.36
Both parties were committed	17 (74)	11 (58)	0.62
Topics discussed
Research	19 (83)	13 (68)	0.69
Leadership	16 (70)	6 (32)	0.16
Clinical	15 (65)	4 (21)	0.07
Work/Life Balance	14 (61)	5 (26)	0.16
Teaching	11 (48)	6 (32)	0.48
Tangible results for mentee as a result of program	4 (17)	7 (37)	0.27
Productivity	1 (3.1)	3 (16)	0.25
Promotion	3 (9.4)	2 (11)	0.82
National Committees	0	2 (11)
Would recommend mentor/mentee	21 (91)	11 (58)	0.35
Personal benefit	14 (61)	10 (53)	0.77
Career enhanced	9 (40)	10 (53)	0.59
Will continue to meet	17 (74)	11 (58)	0.62
Biannual commitment was reasonable	22 (95)	11 (58)	0.29
Would recommend the mentorship program	20 (87)	12 (63)	0.50