Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 9;14:1117996. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1117996

Table 3.

Subgroup analysis of the association between Ln HOMA-IR and Ln OSI.

Subgroups Subjects n (%) β (95%CI) P value P for interaction
Age tertile (y): 0.5570
 < 35 1415 (93.83%) -0.18 (-0.26, -0.11) <0.0001
 ≥ 35 93 (6.17%) -0.11 (-0.45, 0.23) 0.5300
BMI categories: 0.3930
 Normal weight 628 (41.64%) -0.19 (-0.29, -0.09) 0.0002
 Overweight/obese 880 (58.36%) -0.25 (-0.35, -0.16) <0.0001
AMH (ng/ml): 0.2802
 ≤ 5 382 (26.45%) -0.14 (-0.27, -0.01) 0.0378
 > 5 1062 (73.55%) -0.21 (-0.30, -0.12) <0.0001
Initial Gn dose (IU): 0.9251
 < 150 891 (59.08%) -0.18 (-0.27, -0.08) 0.0002
 ≥ 150 617 (40.92%) -0.16 (-0.28, -0.04) 0.0089
COS procotol 0.9834
 GnRH agonist 1268 (84.08%) -0.18 (-0.26, -0.10) <0.0001
 GnRH antagonist 240 (15.92%) -0.16 (-0.35, 0.03) 0.1031

HOMA-IR, homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance; BMI, Body Mass Index; AMH, anti-mullerian hormone; COS, controlled ovarian stimulation; Gn, gonadotropin; GnRH, gonadotropin releasing hormone. Adjusted, if not stratified, for age, BMI, AMH, basal FSH, initial Gn dose, AFC, and COS protocol.