Table 4.
Performance comparison of various R-BERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers) models built by (1) applying different language models (LMs) as embedding layers and (2) fine-tuning different data sets.
| Data set | Vanilla BERT [45] | BioBERT [57] | PubMedBERT [58] | ClinicalBERT [59] | SciBERT [60] | Average |
| 1 | 0.9389 | 0.9583 | 0.9503 | 0.9519 | 0.9496 | 0.9498 |
| 2 | 0.9435 | 0.9528 | 0.9487 | 0.9489 | 0.9459 | 0.9480 |
| 3 | 0.9360 | 0.9522 | 0.9447 | 0.9432 | 0.9497 | 0.9451 |
| 4 | 0.9406 | 0.9486 | 0.9372 | 0.9448 | 0.9468 | 0.9436 |
| 5 | 0.9093 | 0.9223 | 0.9039 | 0.9262 | 0.9179 | 0.9159 |
| 6 | 0.8847 | 0.9268 | 0.9143 | 0.9102 | 0.9113 | 0.9095 |
| 7 | 0.8965 | 0.9194 | 0.9059 | 0.9132 | 0.8961 | 0.9062 |
| 8 | 0.8781 | 0.9089 | 0.8856 | 0.9162 | 0.9100 | 0.8998 |
| Average | 0.9159 | 0.9362 | 0.9238 | 0.9318 | 0.9284 | N/Aa |
aN/A: not applicable.