Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Mar 23.
Published in final edited form as: Neuropsychology. 2019 Jan 28;33(3):417–424. doi: 10.1037/neu0000506

Table 3.

Unadjusted and Adjusted Models of Probability Discounting Rate Among Consistent Participants

Model variables Unadjusted model
 Adjusted model
β t p β t p
BPAD 1.275   3.650 <.001* 1.228   2.896 .004*
MDD   .286   1.021   .309   .266  .883 .379
SCZ/SCAD   .797   2.739   .007*   .911   2.035 .044*
Age   .014   1.576   .117   .008  .741 .460
Sex −.078   −.347   .729 −.282 −1.251 .213
Smoking status   .207  .639   .524 −.538 −1.558 .121
Antipsychotic treatment   .796   3.312   .001* −.182   −.475 .636
IQ −.025 −3.835 <.001* −.020 −2.580 .011*

Note. Diagnostic groups are in comparison to the healthy control group. A positive β indicates a steeper probability discounting rate. BPAD = bipolar affective disorder; MDD = major depressive disorder; SCZ/SCAD = schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder; IQ = intelligence quotient.

*

p < .05.