Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 23;25(Suppl 1):124–135. doi: 10.1007/s11121-023-01496-3

Table 5.

Details of EBI implementation among clinics implementing mailed fecal testing (n = 108)

n %
Implemented patient remindersa,b 99 91.7
  By telephone callc 85 85.9
  In person/at appointmentc 77 77.8
  By mail (letter/postcard)c 73 73.7
  By online portal notificationc 36 36.4
  By text messagec 35 35.4
  By emailc 23 23.2
  By more than one methodc 93 93.9
Number of times a patient could receive a reminder
  1–2 9 8.3
  3 73 67.6
  ≥ 4 14 13.0
  Missing 12 11.1
Implemented provider remindersa,b 101 93.5
  EHR pop-up messagec 63 62.4
  Flagged patient chartc 55 54.5
  Daily or weekly lists generated indicating patients due for screeningc 49 48.5
  Flagged patient roomc 6 5.9
  By more than one method 55 54.5
Implemented provider assessment and feedbacka 94 87.0
  Weekly/monthlyc 63 67.0
  Quarterly/annually 30 31.9
Implemented practices to reduce structural barriersa,b 103 95.4
  Provided onsite translation or language interpreterc 71 68.9
  Provided patients with assistance in scheduling appointments for endoscopic screening (e.g., colonoscopy)c 69 67.0
  Provided pre-paid mail back materials to send completed tests back to clinic/laboratoryc 66 64.1
  Offered patient navigationc 61 59.2
  Provided patients with transportation to/from clinic and/or endoscopic center, including providing vouchers or payments for transportationc 60 58.3
  Offered fecal screening in conjunction with other visit (e.g., flu shot)c 52 50.5
  Expanded clinic hoursc 46 44.7
  Offered weekend clinic hoursc 32 31.1
  Developed methods (e.g., section in EHR) to track patient barriersc 31 30.1
  Set up alternative screening sitesc 4 3.9
  Provided or connected patients to childcarec 2 1.9

aIndicates type of evidence-based intervention implemented

bPatient reminders, provider reminders, and reducing structural barriers could be implemented in more than one way

cIndicates ways in which each evidence-based intervention was implemented