Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Mar 23.
Published in final edited form as: Kidney Int. 2022 Jun 16;102(3):624–639. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2022.05.021

Figure 2: Relationship of SNP-effects on eGFR-decline baseline-unadjusted with baseline-adjusted effects for the 12 identified variants.

Figure 2:

Shown are: (A) SNP-effects per year and allele for eGFR-decline baseline-unadjusted (“decline”) versus eGFR-decline baseline-adjusted in all studies (ndecline=343,339; ndecline-adj=320,737) and restricted to studies where baseline-adjusted results were computed rather than formula-derived (inserted panel, n=103,970); red line indicates identify line); (B) standardized SNP-effects per year and allele for eGFR-decline baseline-unadjusted (β^DECLINE/sdDECLINE, n=343,339) and per allele for cross-sectional eGFR on ln-scale (β^BL/sdBL, n=765,348 15); grey line indicates phenotype correlation line y=0.34*x (0.34=mean phenotype correlation across studies). For A&B: coding allele is the faster-decline allele (=cross-sectional eGFR-lowering allele). Color codes whether SNP was identified for decline baseline-unadjusted and/or baseline-adjusted. (C) Illustration of the SNP-effect for eGFR-decline baseline-adjusted (standardized to Y-scale) as a sum of the SNP-effect baseline-unadjusted (standardized) and the correlation-weighted SNP-effect on eGFR at baseline (standardized).