Table 3: The 9 variants’ effects on eGFR-decline unadjusted for eGFR-baseline in high-risk subgroups.
SNPID | Locus Name | Decline among DM at baseline |
Decline among CKD at baseline |
Decline among all |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Beta | 95% CI | Beta | 95% CI | Beta 95% CI | |||
A from GWAS/candidate search for decline (baseline-unadjusted) | |||||||
| |||||||
rs34882080 | UMOD-PDILT | 0.159* | 0.108, 0.211 | 0.138* | 0.074, 0.203 | 0.065 | 0.054, 0.076 |
rs77924615 | UMOD-PDILT | 0.136* | 0.084, 0.189 | 0.167* | 0.099, 0.235 | 0.074 | 0.063, 0.085 |
rs10254101 | PRKAG2 | 0.065 | 0.020, 0.110 | 0.095* | 0.042, 0.148 | 0.020 | 0.010, 0.030 |
rs1028455 | SPATA7 | 0.030 | −0.011, 0.071 | 0.085* | 0.034, 0.135 | 0.021 | 0.012, 0.029 |
| |||||||
B from GWAS for declineadj, with association for decline (baseline-unadjusted) | |||||||
| |||||||
rs1458038 | FGF5 | 0.030 | −0.013, 0.072 | 0.040 | −0.013, 0.092 | 0.019 | 0.010, 0.028 |
rs4930319 | OVOL1 | 0.021 | −0.021, 0.062 | 0.031 | −0.019, 0.080 | 0.015 | 0.006, 0.024 |
rs434215 | TPPP § | 0.031 | −0.024, 0.086 | 0.112* | 0.043, 0.180 | 0.020 | 0.006, 0.035 |
rs28857283 | C15ORF54 | 0.046 | 0.005, 0.086 | 0.042 | −0.007, 0.091 | 0.021 | 0.013, 0.030 |
rs13095391 | ACVR2B | 0.029 | −0.021, 0.080 | 0.006 | −0.054, 0.066 | 0.017 | 0.008, 0.026 |
| |||||||
Average | 0.061 | 0.079 | 0.030 |
SNPID=Variant identifier on GRCh37, Locus name=Nearest Gene, Beta=genetic effect of genetic association where the effect alleles is the same as in Table 1 and Table 2, 95% CI = 95% confidence interval of Beta (Beta±1.96*standard error of the association).
Statistically significant different from zero (P< 0.05/9=5.56×10−3).
Since the lead variant had imputation quality <0.6 in 45% of the studies (median 0.64), we analyzed this variant omitting the imputation quality filter (with filter: decline among DM at baseline beta=−0.093, P=0.338, n=927; decline among eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73m2 beta=0.022, P=0.618, n=2924; median imputation quality=0.74).