Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 4;61(3):e00790-21. doi: 10.1128/jcm.00790-21

TABLE 1.

Comparison of current recommendations from three published guidelines for the performance of diagnostic tests for M. genitalium

NAAT testing recommendation Indication in guideline
United Statesc United Kingdomd Europee
Asymptomatic persons No No Not specified
Test of cure following treatment of persons who test positive Only if resistance testing is not available and moxifloxacin cannot be used Yes, no earlier than 3 wks Consider, no earlier than 3 wks
Sex partners of symptomatic persons who test positive Yes Yes Yes
Resistance testing on all persons who test positive Yes, if availablea Yes (macrolide) Yes (macrolide)b
Men
 NGU Yes, if persistent or recurrent after treatment Yes Yes
 Epididymo-orchitis Not specified Consider Yes, if aged <50 yrs
 Sexually acquired proctitis Consider if symptoms persist after treatment Consider Yes, if C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae are excluded
Women
 Mucopurulent cervicitis Yes, if recurrent Consider Yes
 Symptoms of PID Consider Yes Yes
 Intermenstrual or postcoital bleeding Not specified Yes Yes
 Dysuria with no other known etiology Not specified Not specified Yes
 Sexually acquired proctitis Consider if symptoms persist after treatment Consider Yes, if C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae are excluded
Termination of pregnancy Not specified Not specified Consider
a

In 2023, there are no FDA-cleared NAATs that incorporate resistance testing that are commercially available in the United States. Resistance testing for macrolides and fluoroquinolones is available through the UAB Diagnostic Mycoplasma Laboratory in Birmingham, AL, using validated laboratory-developed PCR assays.

b

Testing for parC mutations is not indicated on a routine basis but is useful after moxifloxacin treatment failure.

c

See reference 15.

d

See reference 78.

e

See reference 17.