Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 23;38(8):1902–1910. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08176-6

Table 3.

Unadjusted Association Between Diagnostic Process Faults and Diagnostic Errors (n = 257)

No. of errors/no. of cases (%)
DEER diagnostic process fault* Prevalence of error with fault Prevalence of error with no fault Unadjusted prevalence ratio (PR)
(95% CI)
p value
Access and presentation 6/31 (19.4) 30/226 (13.3) 1.46 (0.5–2.9) 0.36
History taking 21/67 (31.3) 15/190 (7.9) 3.97 (2.3–6.9)  < 0.01
Physical exam 13/23 (56.5) 23/234 (9.8) 5.75 (3.4–10.1)  < 0.01
Testing ordering, performance, and interpretation 22/51 (43.1) 14/206 (6.8) 6.35 (3.3–13.4)  < 0.01
Patient follow-up and monitoring 12/21 (57.1) 24/236 (10.2) 5.62 (3.0–9.6)  < 0.01
Consultation and referral 6/25 (24.0) 30/232 (12.9) 1.86 (0.5–4.3) 0.14
Health care teamwork 4/7 (57.1) 32/250 (12.8) 4.46 (0.0–7.8)  < 0.01
Patient communication 2/5 (40.0) 34/252 (13.5) 2.96 (0.0–9.2) 0.12
Clinical assessment 32/51 (62.7) 4/206 (1.9) 32.31 (15.0–146.5)  < 0.01
COVID-19 related 18/61 (29.5) 18/196 (9.2) 3.21 (1.9–5.8)  < 0.01

*See Appendix Table 7 for groupings