Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 23;270(7):3442–3450. doi: 10.1007/s00415-023-11669-3

Table 2.

Means (standard deviations) of writing and cortical excitability outcomes measured during pre-tests

Sham group tDCS group Sham vs. tDCS, p value
Trained task (tablet)
 Amplitude (cm)
  OFF 1.38 (0.19) 1.40 (0.26) 0.86
  ON 1.45 (0.26) 1.47 (0.29) 0.83
  p value 0.29 0.17
Untrained task (tablet)
 Amplitude (cm)
  OFF 1.30 (0.10) 1.27 (0.14) 0.34
  ON 1.34 (0.10) 1.31 (0.11) 0.35
  p value 0.15 0.06
Dual task (tablet)
 DTIamplitude (%)
  OFF − 4.63 (5.65) − 4.67 (5.78) 0.98
  ON − 3.30 (5.45) − 1.98 (4.52) 0.43
  p value 0.48 0.13
SOS-test (paper)
 Writing quality score (0–10)
  OFF 4.53 (1.35) 4.60 (1.67) 0.88
  ON 3.89 (1.91) 4.42 (1.80) 0.39
  p value 0.18 0.58
Cortical excitability
 RMT (%)
  OFF 47.80 (7.80) 47.63 (6.06) 0.94
  ON 47.07 (7.03) 47.25 (5.96) 0.94
  p value 0.10 0.14
 MEP size (mV)
  OFF 1.79 (1.13) 2.07 (2.09) 0.66
  ON 2.29 (1.62) 1.89 (1.65) 0.52
  p value 0.33 0.62
 SICI (%)
  OFF 53.97 (26.62) 55.01 (35.12) 0.93
  ON 51.47 (27.17) 58.29 (38.35) 0.59
  p value 0.67 0.93

DTI dual-task interference, MEP motor evoked potentials, RMT resting motor threshold, SICI short-interval intra-cortical inhibition, SOS-test the ‘Systematic Screening of Handwriting Difficulties’-test, tDCS transcranial direct current stimulation