Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 May 19.
Published in final edited form as: J Comput Graph Stat. 2022 May 19;31(4):1375–1383. doi: 10.1080/10618600.2022.2067552

Table 1.

Simulation Settings. The last column refers to the percentage of the population for whom Treatment 1 would be more beneficial than Treatment −1

Setting T i Treatment 1 benefit
1 (linear) 1Xi,1(1)+2Xi,2(1)Xi,1(2)+Xi,2(2)+2Xi,5(2) 60%
2 (quadratic) 1+Xi,1(1)+2Xi,2(1)+Xi,1(2)(Xi,2(2))2+(Xi,5(2))2 60%
3 (quadratic, more predictors) 1+Xi,1(1)+2Xi,2(1)(Xi,3(1))2+Xi,1(2)Xi,2(2)+2(Xi,5(2))2+2(Xi,6(2))2 80%
4 (quadratic, weak signal) 1+Xi,1(1)+0.5Xi,2(1)(Xi,3(2))2+Xi,1(2)0.5Xi,2(2)+0.5(Xi,5(2))2 60%
5 (two-way interaction) 1(Xi,1(1)+2Xi,2(1))2+(Xi,1(2)Xi,2(2))2+Xi,5(2) 50%
6 (exponential) 1exp(Xi,1(1))Xi,2(1)+exp(Xi,1(2))+Xi,2(2) 70%