Skip to main content
. 2023 Mar 9;11:1108756. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1108756

Table 3.

Subgroup analysis results.

Outcome Subgroup Studies Patients RR 95% CI Heterogeneity P-value F/R
Effective rate Types of medications (AP vs.CM)
Vitamin B6 + metoclopramide 1 60 RR = 1.73 (1.18–2.55) NR P = 0.005 R
Venous metoclopramide 1 90 RR = 1.56 (1.21–2.00) NR P = 0.001 R
Sodium lactate ringer's injection 1 60 RR = 1.42 (1.01–2.01) NR P = 0.046 R
Effective rate Sample size (AP vs. placebo)
≤ 100 3 158 RR = 3.57 (0.06–200.44) 98.60% P = 0.536 R
>100 3 691 RR = 1.04 (0.79–1.37) 76.80% P = 0.781 R
Effective rate Publication year (AP vs. placebo)
>2010 3 520 RR = 1.28 (0.79–2.06) 91.00% P = 0.313 R
<2010 3 329 RR = 1.93 (0.50–7.40) 94.40% P = 0.340 R
Effective rate Types of medications (AT vs.CM)
Vitamin B 1 94 RR = 1.65 (1.20–2.28) NR P = 0.002 R
Glucose+Vitamin B6+sodium bicarbonate+Phenobarbital 1 100 RR = 4.40 (1.81–10.70) NR P = 0.001 R
Ringer's solution+vitamin B+vitamin C 1 36 RR = 1.13 (0.90–1.43) NR P = 0.297 R

RR, risk ratio; F, Fixed effects model; R, Random effects model; CI, confidence interval; NR, not report; AP, acupressure; AT, acupuncture treatment; CM, conventional medicine.