Table 1. Distribution of training data with 90 percent hybrid images.
View | 1. Number of original training images | 2. Number (percent) of donors | 3. Number of times each donor is sampled | 4. Number of hybrid images generated | 5. Number (percent) of original training images sampled | 6. Total number of training images | 7. Percent of hybrid images in total training data |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3VT | 3193 | 297 (9.3) | 22 | 6534 | 700 (22) | 7234 | 90.3 |
3VV | 6178 | 439 (7.1) | 15 | 6585 | 700 (11) | 7285 | 90.4 |
LVOT | 6735 | 469 (7.0) | 14 | 6566 | 700 (10) | 7266 | 90.4 |
A4C | 6029 | 570 (9.5) | 12 | 6840 | 700 (12) | 7540 | 90.7 |
ABDO | 5206 | 475 (9.1) | 14 | 6650 | 700 (13) | 7350 | 90.5 |
NT | 25082 | 633 (2.5) | 50 | 31650 | 3500 (14) | 35150 | 90.0 |
TOTAL | 52423 | 2883 (5.5) | N/A | 64825 | 7000 (13) | 71825 | 90.2 |
Distribution of training data where 90 percent of training data consists of hybrid images generated in an offline manner (columns 6, 7). Only about five percent (column 2) of the original training images (column 1) are used to generate all the new hybrid training images (column 4). Overall, the entire hybrid training dataset (column 6) was derived from only 13 percent of the original images. Column 3 denotes the number of times each donor is samples. A total number is not applicable here.